| Posted by: Gonzo787 at February 4, 2007, 1:38 pm | | Topic: Poker stars vs Party poker? Forum: Bonus Whores | Sigurd wrote: Any reason to not have accounts at both places and just play the juciest tables wherever they are??
Good point. Don't forget that this is wise to take advantage of each bonus offered too. | | Static Link |
| Posted by: Gonzo787 at February 3, 2007, 3:45 pm | | Topic: Poker stars vs Party poker? Forum: Bonus Whores | | I can't speak personally from a quality of game perspective, but as far as being able to run multiple tables on your computer but Stars and Party both run fairly well when multi-tabling. Both sites also let you resize tables, which allow you to play more tables on your screen without overlap. | | Static Link |
| Posted by: yenool at February 3, 2007, 3:24 am | | Topic: Poker stars vs Party poker? Forum: Bonus Whores | Well, which site is best for a TAG who wants to multi-table (5-6 tables) NL 25c or NL 50c ?
Just cleared the Party reload bonus and I have to say I was impressed with how easy my PC could run 6 tables there, poker stars seems ok but I don't know if poker ace HUD works with tables in the mini-view mode there or not.
Right now I am playing on Prima with rakeback... problem being I can only play 2 tables without bringing my PC to a stand still......
So rakeback but only half the tables / half win rate, then of course I have to factor in bordom factor of only playing 2 tables and then playing too many hands..... | | Static Link |
|