| Posted by: BCsparky at February 11, 2008, 5:36 pm | | Topic: iPoker moves ahead of Party Poker in traffic Forum: Bonus Whores | fatshaft wrote: ckmj23 wrote: I want something in between. Large is too large, and miniview is too small. They need to be properly resizeable like the other major rooms do, where you can manually drag the window to a size of your liking. The all or nothing miniview is awful, and limits me to four big tables as I can't use the mini view in its current format.
I'd like to see them lose the fisher price style cards as well, and the incredibly grating turn to act sound.
Would like to see the chips properly represented rather than just a rough amount of chips that actually don't represent the amount you've bet.
Tons of other niggles, but that'll do for now.
They've done very very well, with a very poor piece of software.
Version 2 beta of Ibolide has larger hole cards in the miniview.
_________________
Every day above ground is a good day | | Static Link |
| Posted by: fatshaft at January 21, 2008, 5:12 am | | Topic: iPoker moves ahead of Party Poker in traffic Forum: Bonus Whores | ckmj23 wrote: I want something in between. Large is too large, and miniview is too small. They need to be properly resizeable like the other major rooms do, where you can manually drag the window to a size of your liking. The all or nothing miniview is awful, and limits me to four big tables as I can't use the mini view in its current format.
I'd like to see them lose the fisher price style cards as well, and the incredibly grating turn to act sound.
Would like to see the chips properly represented rather than just a rough amount of chips that actually don't represent the amount you've bet.
Tons of other niggles, but that'll do for now.
They've done very very well, with a very poor piece of software. | | Static Link |
| Posted by: daraider at January 19, 2008, 3:42 pm | | Topic: iPoker moves ahead of Party Poker in traffic Forum: Bonus Whores | chadattak wrote: I use mini-table with pokerbolide to make the cards bigger and I love it, I can play 10 tables without problem.
You can't make the hole cards bigger with it. I emailed them to check this was case and it is. | | Static Link |
| Posted by: ckmj23 at January 19, 2008, 12:45 pm | | Topic: iPoker moves ahead of Party Poker in traffic Forum: Bonus Whores | chadattak wrote: I use mini-table with pokerbolide to make the cards bigger and I love it, I can play 10 tables without problem.
Havent tried the miniview with ibolide. I should be able to get a decent amount of tables on a 24" 1920x1200 res.
_________________
Chowderhead71 wants to be the mother of my children. | | Static Link |
| Posted by: ckmj23 at January 19, 2008, 12:45 pm | | Topic: iPoker moves ahead of Party Poker in traffic Forum: Bonus Whores | chadattak wrote: I use mini-table with pokerbolide to make the cards bigger and I love it, I can play 10 tables without problem.
Havent tried the miniview with ibolide. I should be able to get a decent amount of tables on a 24" 1920x1200 res.
_________________
RmplTILTskin [observer]: I LOST BC U SUCK
RmplTILTskin [observer]: NOT UNLUCK
EireDuck: Pot odds my rabbity friend | | Static Link |
| Posted by: BCsparky at January 18, 2008, 7:07 pm | | Topic: iPoker moves ahead of Party Poker in traffic Forum: Bonus Whores | Gonzo787 wrote: ckmj23 wrote: iPoker is the new Party. Now if only someone can convince them to make some software changes.
iBolide improves on the horrid table layout. Lack of resizeable tables is all that is standing in the way of Online Poker domination.
They have mini tables, which allows 9 tables without overlap on a 1600x1200 and 4 on a 1024x768.
Your hole cards are too small when trying to 9 table miniview!!
_________________
Every day above ground is a good day | | Static Link |
| Posted by: ckmj23 at January 18, 2008, 4:26 pm | | Topic: iPoker moves ahead of Party Poker in traffic Forum: Bonus Whores | I want something in between. Large is too large, and miniview is too small.
_________________
RmplTILTskin [observer]: I LOST BC U SUCK
RmplTILTskin [observer]: NOT UNLUCK
EireDuck: Pot odds my rabbity friend | | Static Link |
| Posted by: Gonzo787 at January 18, 2008, 3:29 pm | | Topic: iPoker moves ahead of Party Poker in traffic Forum: Bonus Whores | ckmj23 wrote: iPoker is the new Party. Now if only someone can convince them to make some software changes.
iBolide improves on the horrid table layout. Lack of resizeable tables is all that is standing in the way of Online Poker domination.
They have mini tables, which allows 9 tables without overlap on a 1600x1200 and 4 on a 1024x768. | | Static Link |
| Posted by: ckmj23 at January 18, 2008, 1:50 pm | | Topic: iPoker moves ahead of Party Poker in traffic Forum: Bonus Whores | iPoker is the new Party. Now if only someone can convince them to make some software changes.
iBolide improves on the horrid table layout. Lack of resizeable tables is all that is standing in the way of Online Poker domination.
_________________
Chowderhead71 wants to be the mother of my children. | | Static Link |
| Posted by: ckmj23 at January 18, 2008, 1:50 pm | | Topic: iPoker moves ahead of Party Poker in traffic Forum: Bonus Whores | iPoker is the new Party. Now if only someone can convince them to make some software changes.
iBolide improves on the horrid table layout. Lack of resizeable tables is all that is standing in the way of Online Poker domination.
_________________
RmplTILTskin [observer]: I LOST BC U SUCK
RmplTILTskin [observer]: NOT UNLUCK
EireDuck: Pot odds my rabbity friend | | Static Link |
| Posted by: Gonzo787 at January 18, 2008, 1:09 pm | | Topic: iPoker moves ahead of Party Poker in traffic Forum: Bonus Whores | GoldBoar wrote: I saw this too, when I was checking PSS to see why I can't find any traffic at Eurolinx. How does your "dynamic room order" work, if it has also moved Ongame above Party?
I noticed this too.
Ok, first of all, we use PokerSiteScout data for sites they track. For rooms that are not automatically tracked, we gather our own data manually. This data is used for everything from Game Quality to organize the room order that is on the right navigation.
Anyway, where we differ from PSS is that we only account for the limits that are "whorable"-- 0.50/1.00 and up for LHE and 0.10/0.20 and up for NLHE and the equivalent limits on other games such as Omaha. These are the same limits you will see in the clearance rates and game quality on BW. Anyway, I believe this is the reason for the discrepancy. Everest Poker is another example, they are #6 on PSS and we have them at around #11 (BTW each 5 "Size" groups represents 20% of the indu... | | Read Entire Entry |
| Posted by: GoldBoar at January 18, 2008, 12:35 pm | | Topic: iPoker moves ahead of Party Poker in traffic Forum: Bonus Whores | I saw this too, when I was checking PSS to see why I can't find any traffic at Eurolinx. How does your "dynamic room order" work, if it has also moved Ongame above Party?
_________________
"So you put the caulk in the crack... and that's home improvement?" | | Static Link |
| Posted by: GoldBoar at January 18, 2008, 12:35 pm | | Topic: iPoker moves ahead of Party Poker in traffic Forum: Bonus Whores | I saw this too, when I was checking PSS to see why I can't find any traffic at Eurolinx. How does your "dynamic room order" work, if it has also moved Ongame above Party?
_________________
Vampire Slayer as career choice: Pros: specialized; rewarding. Cons: dangerous; work nights. | | Static Link |
| Posted by: Gonzo787 at January 18, 2008, 1:59 am | | Topic: iPoker moves ahead of Party Poker in traffic Forum: Bonus Whores | I thought it was strange that Party Poker was now below iPoker and Ongame on our dynamic room order on the right navigation (visible from the BW front page). Sure enough, iPoker has passed them...
PartyPoker slides into 4th place in traffic rankings (January 17, 2008)
PartyPoker continued its slide in the PokerScout traffic rankings yesterday, falling to fourth place behind the fast-growing iPoker Network.
PartyPoker, once the reigning king of online poker, lost its crown to PokerStars immediately after pulling out from the US market in the wake of anti-gambling legislation in 2006. Since then, PokerStars has continued to gain market share, while US-friendly Full Tilt Poker has firmly passed PartyPoker and settled into second place.
European-focused iPoker Network has been gaining steam ever since absorbing the smaller Tribeca and Tain networks in early 2007. Whether the network can hang on to the third place spot remains to be seen, as it is now virtually tie... | | Read Entire Entry |
|