Casino Talks

Casino Classic
Get $500 free on the house!

Categories:

free casino  internet poker  texas holdem  betting  poker bonus codes  poker tables  poker tips  online slots  play poker  poker game  poker table  slots  free slots  casino chips  online texas holdem  play casino  gambling system  poker rooms  poker games  poker sites  playing cards  poker room  poker rules  poker  casino gambling  gambling casinos  online poker  free gambling  online casino  free online poker  

Links:

Movie Talks
Forum Extractor

Posted by: phatlad at September 5, 2005, 4:48 am
Topic: Party new rake Forum: Bonus Whores
sigmajin wrote: phatlad wrote: sigmajin wrote: in addition to changing the rake requirements, party (but not any of its skins) seems to have introduced micro-limit tables available only to people who have opened their account in the past 45 days or something (under the beginners tab)

Out of curiosity, I left a party account open all day to see what the raked hand percent was... over 60% on the $5 NL tables, with -- get this -- .02 and .04 blinds.

Especially if youve got alot of gnomes opening accounts too, it almost seems like it would be worthwhile to fold every hand to play out the bonus for risk free money (esp if youre like me and at a computer a lot but not able to fully concentrate enough to play poker, or if you dont have much poker experience) Even after the price of all the folds, you'd be keeping ninety-five cents on every dollar of bonus on a 5X bonus and .9 cents on every dollar on a 10X bonus.


Dude... sorry if someone brought it u...
Read Entire Entry

Posted by: sigmajin at September 5, 2005, 4:28 am
Topic: Party new rake Forum: Bonus Whores
phatlad wrote: sigmajin wrote: in addition to changing the rake requirements, party (but not any of its skins) seems to have introduced micro-limit tables available only to people who have opened their account in the past 45 days or something (under the beginners tab)

Out of curiosity, I left a party account open all day to see what the raked hand percent was... over 60% on the $5 NL tables, with -- get this -- .02 and .04 blinds.

Especially if youve got alot of gnomes opening accounts too, it almost seems like it would be worthwhile to fold every hand to play out the bonus for risk free money (esp if youre like me and at a computer a lot but not able to fully concentrate enough to play poker, or if you dont have much poker experience) Even after the price of all the folds, you'd be keeping ninety-five cents on every dollar of bonus on a 5X bonus and .9 cents on every dollar on a 10X bonus.


Dude... sorry if someone brought it up already (i did a searc...
Read Entire Entry

Posted by: phatlad at September 5, 2005, 3:44 am
Topic: Party new rake Forum: Bonus Whores
sigmajin wrote: in addition to changing the rake requirements, party (but not any of its skins) seems to have introduced micro-limit tables available only to people who have opened their account in the past 45 days or something (under the beginners tab)

Out of curiosity, I left a party account open all day to see what the raked hand percent was... over 60% on the $5 NL tables, with -- get this -- .02 and .04 blinds.

Especially if youve got alot of gnomes opening accounts too, it almost seems like it would be worthwhile to fold every hand to play out the bonus for risk free money (esp if youre like me and at a computer a lot but not able to fully concentrate enough to play poker, or if you dont have much poker experience) Even after the price of all the folds, you'd be keeping ninety-five cents on every dollar of bonus on a 5X bonus and .9 cents on every dollar on a 10X bonus.
Static Link

Posted by: sigmajin at September 5, 2005, 3:10 am
Topic: Party new rake Forum: Bonus Whores
in addition to changing the rake requirements, party (but not any of its skins) seems to have introduced micro-limit tables available only to people who have opened their account in the past 45 days or something (under the beginners tab)

Out of curiosity, I left a party account open all day to see what the raked hand percent was... over 60% on the $5 NL tables, with -- get this -- .02 and .04 blinds.

Especially if youve got alot of gnomes opening accounts too, it almost seems like it would be worthwhile to fold every hand to play out the bonus for risk free money (esp if youre like me and at a computer a lot but not able to fully concentrate enough to play poker, or if you dont have much poker experience) Even after the price of all the folds, you'd be keeping ninety-five cents on every dollar of bonus on a 5X bonus and .9 cents on every dollar on a 10X bonus.
Static Link

Posted by: andrew26 at September 4, 2005, 5:17 pm
Topic: Party new rake Forum: Bonus Whores
Wellington wrote: Wellington wrote: Hmmm, I don't think anything has changed for the raked hands (or maybe it has changed back). It still takes a $2 pot in NL. This was the case on empire. I would love to be proved wrong.

Maybe I need to put the bong down. I just checked again and it looks like any rake is counted, so a minimum $1 pot in NL.

The interesting thing is that if you are playing a 10X bonus (like the current Empire reload) and they rake $.05, you are earning $.10 in bonus for that hand.

Even better, if you are playing a 7X reload, you are getting back $.1428 per raked hand.

This has to be the best bonus clearing method in all of whoredom.
_________________
Andrew26 wins pot $.95, with a Royal Flush, spades.
Static Link

Posted by: Wellington at September 4, 2005, 4:55 pm
Topic: Party new rake Forum: Bonus Whores
Wellington wrote: Hmmm, I don't think anything has changed for the raked hands (or maybe it has changed back). It still takes a $2 pot in NL. This was the case on empire. I would love to be proved wrong.

Maybe I need to put the bong down. I just checked again and it looks like any rake is counted, so a minimum $1 pot in NL.
Static Link

Posted by: Wolfman at September 4, 2005, 4:35 pm
Topic: Party new rake Forum: Bonus Whores
On the $50NL tables today I'm getting a 78% raked hand rate.

Now that's bonus whoring!!
Static Link

Posted by: andrew26 at September 4, 2005, 4:37 am
Topic: Party new rake Forum: Bonus Whores
phatlad wrote: Significantly tighter tonight. -- or this morning if you will. Between the hours of 3:30 a.m. to 6 a.m. central time, only 305 of 496 hands raked. I've been hitting between 75-80 percent raked in this time period since the new rake went into effect, but not tonight.

Lots of people betting the pot on the button with several limpers and the limpers all folding, which is unusual from my experience. Finished up $150 though, so I'm not complaining.

Probably due to the whore influx for the Empire turbo bonus.
_________________
Andrew26 wins pot $.95, with a Royal Flush, spades.
Static Link

Posted by: phatlad at September 4, 2005, 4:16 am
Topic: Party new rake Forum: Bonus Whores
Significantly tighter tonight. -- or this morning if you will. Between the hours of 3:30 a.m. to 6 a.m. central time, only 305 of 496 hands raked. I've been hitting between 75-80 percent raked in this time period since the new rake went into effect, but not tonight.

Lots of people betting the pot on the button with several limpers and the limpers all folding, which is unusual from my experience. Finished up $150 though, so I'm not complaining.
Static Link

Posted by: phatlad at September 3, 2005, 11:53 pm
Topic: Party new rake Forum: Bonus Whores
Cleared party in 942 total hands at $25PL tables, for 74 percent.
Static Link

Posted by: Wolfman at September 3, 2005, 11:49 pm
Topic: Party new rake Forum: Bonus Whores
I'm getting 66% on the $25 tables, not too much higher then before. The no-flop no drop accounts for more hands than I credited.

I'll try the $50 next and see if the percentage is any higher.
Static Link

Posted by: phatlad at September 3, 2005, 11:40 pm
Topic: Party new rake Forum: Bonus Whores
I'm on Empire NL right now and a nickel was taken out of a $1.25 pot.
Static Link

Posted by: Wellington at September 3, 2005, 10:50 pm
Topic: Party new rake Forum: Bonus Whores
Hmmm, I don't think anything has changed for the raked hands (or maybe it has changed back). It still takes a $2 pot in NL. This was the case on empire. I would love to be proved wrong.
Static Link

Posted by: andrew26 at September 3, 2005, 5:51 am
Topic: Party new rake Forum: Bonus Whores
I cleared the Party last night at the $25 NL, and I would estimate that 80% of hands dealt were raked.

This has got me thinking about the multi 20X reloads... at $25 NL it is doable with minimal bankroll risk.
_________________
Andrew26 wins pot $.95, with a Royal Flush, spades.
Static Link

Posted by: hammer2457 at September 2, 2005, 10:35 pm
Topic: Party new rake Forum: Bonus Whores
Empire is counting a 5c rake toward the bonus I just cleared there. Don't know about Multi Poker.
Static Link

Posted by: Wolfman at September 2, 2005, 9:30 am
Topic: Party new rake Forum: Bonus Whores
I bounced around the skins last night just to take a look.

The new rake structure applies to all of them. I can't say for sure that they will all count the nickel raked hands as raked, but party does so it makes sense that they would also.
Static Link

Posted by: LottaFagina at September 2, 2005, 4:51 am
Topic: Party new rake Forum: Bonus Whores
Can anybody confirm if the new rake structure applies to all Party skins? That's going to make a LOT of difference in the various Multipoker Madness, Empire PlaySep, etc bonuses currently being offered in the near term.

Also going to require fiddling with the bonus grid...
Static Link

Posted by: Wolfman at September 1, 2005, 8:02 pm
Topic: Party new rake Forum: Bonus Whores
Quote: I'm thinking this is going to mean nearly 100% rake rate on the $50NL tables


Yep, I was right except for the no-flop no drop. But every hand that sees a flop is being raked now.
Static Link

Posted by: jojothekid at September 1, 2005, 7:58 pm
Topic: Party new rake Forum: Bonus Whores
It's a lot different for us 25NL6max guys, a 7x usually takes me 7 hours, done in less than 4 hours today. from $14/hr to about $27/hr that is a slight difference, they can have all the damn nickels they want lol.
Static Link

Posted by: Wolfman at September 1, 2005, 7:00 pm
Topic: Party new rake Forum: Bonus Whores
Whew, you scared me for a minute Tarheel.

Back to Yee-ha!
Static Link

Posted by: banshee75 at September 1, 2005, 6:25 pm
Topic: Party new rake Forum: Bonus Whores
just played 436 at 25nl and 257 raked, no difference than before.
Static Link

Posted by: tarheel1 at September 1, 2005, 6:17 pm
Topic: Party new rake Forum: Bonus Whores
LottaFagina wrote: tarheel1 wrote: okay I think we have a misunderstanding here.
Party now rakes a pot at $1 instead of $2 but for a raked hand to count as a raked hand for a bonus it still must reach $5.00 ot a $.25 rake.


Nope, you're confused. Any rake at all, even $.05, counts towards your bonus. At least it is for my REALCHANCE which I'm knocking down right now on NL25...


Im no longer confused
_________________
blah blah blah
Static Link

Posted by: LottaFagina at September 1, 2005, 6:09 pm
Topic: Party new rake Forum: Bonus Whores
tarheel1 wrote: okay I think we have a misunderstanding here.
Party now rakes a pot at $1 instead of $2 but for a raked hand to count as a raked hand for a bonus it still must reach $5.00 ot a $.25 rake.


Nope, you're confused. Any rake at all, even $.05, counts towards your bonus. At least it is for my REALCHANCE which I'm knocking down right now on NL25...
Static Link

Posted by: BadBeatBill at September 1, 2005, 5:58 pm
Topic: Party new rake Forum: Bonus Whores
tarheel1 wrote: okay I think we have a misunderstanding here.
Party now rakes a pot at $1 instead of $2 but for a raked hand to count as a raked hand for a bonus it still must reach $5.00 ot a $.25 rake.

old party no rake was taken until the pot reached $2 when a $.10 rake was taken. now when the pot reaches $1 a $.05 rake is taken


am I correct or am I the confused one?

In limit it's gotta be $5, but those aren't raked until then anyways. My bonus status shows all the 5c pots as being raked.....
_________________
wontstop985 wrote:
and for the record:
poker income: $7000/month
sex: 2-5 times/day, usually twice; most: 20 times in 4 days
Static Link

Posted by: tarheel1 at September 1, 2005, 5:54 pm
Topic: Party new rake Forum: Bonus Whores
okay I think we have a misunderstanding here.
Party now rakes a pot at $1 instead of $2 but for a raked hand to count as a raked hand for a bonus it still must reach $5.00 ot a $.25 rake.

old party no rake was taken until the pot reached $2 when a $.10 rake was taken. now when the pot reaches $1 a $.05 rake is taken


am I correct or am I the confused one?
_________________
blah blah blah
Static Link

Posted by: chachcox at September 1, 2005, 5:32 pm
Topic: Party new rake Forum: Bonus Whores
***** Hand History for Game 2636771497 *****
$25 NL Texas Hold'em - Thursday, September 01, 20:22:05 EDT 2005
Table Table 37402 (Real Money)
Seat 7 is the button
Total number of players : 10
Seat 2: tuffluck44 ( $26 )
Seat 3: jarhead95 ( $38.65 )
Seat 6: sara1212dog ( $22.75 )
Seat 7: chachcox ( $35.75 )
Seat 9: cujo_fan ( $18.45 )
Seat 10: minde1976 ( $29.75 )
Seat 4: poloplayerrl ( $3.80 )
Seat 1: rob3156 ( $14.80 )
Seat 5: MikeeMiracle ( $28.80 )
Seat 8: Hahamood ( $24.75 )
Hahamood posts small blind [$0.10].
cujo_fan posts big blind [$0.25].
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to chachcox [ 8d 8h ]
minde1976 folds.
rob3156 raises [$2].
tuffluck44 folds.
jarhead95 folds.
poloplayerrl folds.
MikeeMiracle folds.
sara1212dog folds.
chachcox calls [$2].
Hahamood folds.
cujo_fan calls [$1.75].
** Dealing Flop ** [ 8c, 4c, Ad ]
cujo_fan checks.
rob3156 bets [$2]...
Read Entire Entry

Posted by: Wolfman at September 1, 2005, 5:16 pm
Topic: Party new rake Forum: Bonus Whores
I'm thinking this is going to mean nearly 100% rake rate on the $50NL tables, no? 1 limper pushes it over a dollar.

Yee-ha!
Static Link

Posted by: chachcox at September 1, 2005, 5:06 pm
Topic: Party new rake Forum: Bonus Whores
The 25 NL tables are worthless now ... Theres been 2 +10 $ pots in a half hour ... Booo.

Its like playing .10/25 LH.
Static Link

Posted by: Johnny Empire at September 1, 2005, 4:33 pm
Topic: Party new rake Forum: Bonus Whores
Heh, we like a little rake over no rake. Poker Room gave us "way too much rake", which no one liked.
_________________
At war with luck since 1990.
Static Link

Posted by: Mendacious at September 1, 2005, 4:28 pm
Topic: Party new rake Forum: Bonus Whores
Only at this site to people applaud more rake!
Static Link

Posted by: blosky2001 at September 1, 2005, 2:48 pm
Topic: Party new rake Forum: Bonus Whores
Does this go in effect for Empire this weekend to make that bonus look more attractive?
Static Link

Posted by: jojothekid at September 1, 2005, 2:39 pm
Topic: Party new rake Forum: Bonus Whores
This is great, I play the 25NL6max games and play 3 tables I ripped my 700 hands in less than 3 hours for my hundo. The 6 max is ideal because they all limp and you get near or over 100 hands/hr. Hooray BEER.
Static Link

Posted by: kdogg007 at September 1, 2005, 1:56 pm
Topic: Party new rake Forum: Bonus Whores
This is fantastic news, I was getting about 66% raked at NL50, if this bumps it up to 75-80% then great!
Static Link

Posted by: TheJourneyman at September 1, 2005, 1:55 pm
Topic: Party new rake Forum: Bonus Whores
phatlad wrote: That was when 25PL was .25/.5 blinds, right? Almost every damned hand was raked then.

And CHE, I suggest you come slumming to the 25PL tables. Decent table selection. My BB/100 is 22. Of course it still sucks when your AA gets cracked by 62 s00ted on a rainbow flop and catching runner runner flush. But damn, I hardly play limit at Party anymore.

I'll definately give it a try if they are raking at a $1 and it counts towards bonus. I played the $25 till they changed the blinds then moved up and the play was just as bad - as I have seen with the $100PL tables too but there just aren't many going when I am playing.
Static Link

Posted by: phatlad at September 1, 2005, 1:08 pm
Topic: Party new rake Forum: Bonus Whores
That was when 25PL was .25/.5 blinds, right? Almost every damned hand was raked then.

And CHE, I suggest you come slumming to the 25PL tables. Decent table selection. My BB/100 is 22. Of course it still sucks when your AA gets cracked by 62 s00ted on a rainbow flop and catching runner runner flush. But damn, I hardly play limit at Party anymore.
Static Link

Posted by: TheJourneyman at September 1, 2005, 12:46 pm
Topic: Party new rake Forum: Bonus Whores
pilgrimshoes wrote: before they changed it last time, i used to get >85% raked on the 25pl and 50pl

that was the way to go... hopefully it gets back close to those numbers again

CHE should be able to back me up on this, around jan-mar this year.

Yep I did too and you had plenty of tables to choose from - now you are lucky if there are 2 50PL games going.
Static Link

Posted by: pilgrimshoes at September 1, 2005, 12:43 pm
Topic: Party new rake Forum: Bonus Whores
before they changed it last time, i used to get >85% raked on the 25pl and 50pl

that was the way to go... hopefully it gets back close to those numbers again

CHE should be able to back me up on this, around jan-mar this year.
_________________
hey, its that guy
Static Link

Posted by: phatlad at September 1, 2005, 12:42 pm
Topic: Party new rake Forum: Bonus Whores
I put this in the bonus discussion, but zo or jek can move it to sites if necessary.

Party is now raking PL and NL games at $1 as opposed to $2. I believe this just went into effect today.

Last month, in 10,335 PL25 hands on Party and skins, 3,900 were not raked at all. I'm going to lowball and estimate that 1/3 of those would've been raked under this new rake structure, given that there's usually 4 or 5 limpers and the first pot-sized bet wins the pot a lot of the time in PL.

With these lowball estimates, instead of 64% of hands being raked and counting toward bonuses, 75% of hands are raked and counting bonuses.

This makes unattractive bonuses like Empire's and *gulp* multi's more attractive for the low-limit whore.
Static Link







Casino Classic.
Get $500 free on the house!



CLOSE