| Posted by: bing at September 23, 2001, 1:27 pm | | Topic: Global Player 's NON-RANDOM Blackjack Winners... Forum: Winner Online |
Hey retard, I am NOT spamming for this casino. I really could care less about this casino or any other casino. I just stated that I know 3 players on that LIST that are REAL which leads me to believe that the list is not "made up". Do I personally care if you play at this casino? nope. Do whatever you want. I was just commenting on your post about the list not being real. I am on the list, and I am a real person so i know with 100% certaintity that my name wasnt made up nor the 3 others I know.
Now go back to playing slots dumb****.
| | Static Link |
| Posted by: prosperity9035 at September 23, 2001, 10:18 am | | Topic: Global Player 's NON-RANDOM Blackjack Winners... Forum: Winner Online |
Quote: Originally Posted by sammcdon:
RESULTS OF THE GLOBAL PLAYER/GAMEMASTER BLACKJACK TOURNAMENT:
After an early lead by sirius, "bing" had a good run only to be overtaken by "fungus." The consistent wins by "fungus" were incredible and he was far in front until near the ery end. Even more incredible, "fungus" was beaten by Treeny376 who in 100 rounds managed an incredible 1051%. Hats off to the players, etc.
A special thanks goes out to "bing" for taking time out during his busy schedule at the blackjact tournament to REGISTER as a member of this great forum and sing the praises of Global Player.
You see, "bing" is the 9th "person" to sing the praises of Global Player Casino after signing up to POST ONE TIME AND ONE TIME ONLY. This my friends, is SPAMMING at its lowest. Why isn't GLOBAL PLAYER content to pay for its advertising the way all other casinos do?
Thank you "bing" fo... | | Read Entire Entry |
| Posted by: sammcdon at September 23, 2001, 5:17 am | | Topic: Global Player 's NON-RANDOM Blackjack Winners... Forum: Winner Online |
Quote: Originally Posted by bing:
Just saw this thread so I thought I would comment.
That winner list is real. Today I played for the gamemasters BJ tournament
1 bing 115.00 + 430.00 769 1,365.50 233.42% 39 minutes ago
2 Sirius170 50.00 76 113.50 227.00% 11 hours ago
3 Alfi 110.00 51 20.00 18.18% 13 hours ago
4 cccc 201.25 50 35.00 17.39% 13 hours ago
5 NICK249 75.00 189 6.50 8.67% 3 hours ago
MCRen651 70.00 45 0.00 0.00% 4 hours ago
6 Popeye13 50.00 90 0.00 0.00% 15 hours ago
Mike007 50.00 2 -4.00 -8.00% 4 hours ago
7 Wheelio 113.75 178 -15.00 -13.19% 7 hours ago
8 Jim401 50.00 50 -9.50 -19.00% 27 hours ago
9 tko 50.75 + 50.00 526 -78.50 -77.92% 3 hours ago
10 richard 708.75 + 1,500.00 490 -1,971.00 -89.24% 5 hours ago
I know 3 ppl on that list that are real as I have spoken to them.
I highly doubt that this casino "makes up" winners just to add to their list. In fact look at the whole tournament stats. One g... | | Read Entire Entry |
| Posted by: Sirius at September 19, 2001, 2:40 am | | Topic: Global Player 's NON-RANDOM Blackjack Winners... Forum: Winner Online |
I just found out from Micha at Global Player that the extra bets are returned on splits and doubles when the dealer has blackjack. The dealer doesn't peak though so you have to wait until the end.
It is mentioned under 'Winning and Losing' at http://www.global-player.com/help/playing_bj.html
| | Static Link |
| Posted by: sammcdon at September 18, 2001, 6:02 am | | Topic: Global Player 's NON-RANDOM Blackjack Winners... Forum: Winner Online |
Thanks Sirius. Everyone interpreps facts differently. That is why hung juries occur. I believe the evidence is overwhelming and conclusive. And there is more to come.
BTW, did you ever wonder why a player shooting for the top tournament prize did not play in the last 20 hours? Even though he was only 3% behind.
| | Static Link |
| Posted by: Sirius at September 18, 2001, 5:36 am | | Topic: Global Player 's NON-RANDOM Blackjack Winners... Forum: Winner Online |
Maybe I should have noticed this before but 'Atlantic City' rules at Global Player are not correct. The dealer is supposed to check for a blackjack before the player makes any decisions but not at Global Player. It means you have to change your strategy and you lose over 0.1% more than you should.
sammcdon, you haven't presented any evidence against Global Player.
| | Static Link |
| Posted by: sammcdon at September 18, 2001, 5:21 am | | Topic: Global Player 's NON-RANDOM Blackjack Winners... Forum: Winner Online |
In reply to:
"Also loses crdibility by slamming James who probably knows as much or more about gambling than anyone else on this board."
Reply:
You may or may not be right about James. But investigating and interpreting raw data is probably more about logic than about a knowledge of gambling.
| | Static Link |
| Posted by: Sirius at September 17, 2001, 7:30 am | | Topic: Global Player 's NON-RANDOM Blackjack Winners... Forum: Winner Online |
My luck disappeared today. Firstly I went from 400% to 200%. Then fungus went from around 410% to 765%. I then put $150 down on one hand to get a bit closer to him. The dealer had a 10 total and I had two tens. The dealer drew an ace for a blackjack! I lost the remaining two dollars I had.
| | Static Link |
| Posted by: Sirius at September 16, 2001, 4:21 am | | Topic: Global Player 's NON-RANDOM Blackjack Winners... Forum: Winner Online |
I'm beginning to regret joining the tournament so early. Usually I'm the last one to enter.
When I entered I got to 44% to beat a guy on around 40%. Someone then posted in a message board about it asking if anyone could beat me and bing beat me but another guy called Richard had got to 117% ahead of him. I didn't bother trying to catch up because it wasn't too far ahead. Bing then over took Richard and then countless other guys started to play.
One guy got to 200% so I thought I should try and get a bit closer to him. I luckily got to 227% and he then tried catching up and dropped off. Another guy almost caught up too but dropped off. Then bing decided to risk everything to catch up with me again. I just played a hand a few minutes ago to get back in the lead cos I was a bit bored. I luckily won the bet even though the dealer had an ace and I had 3+2+10 and hit again to 18 with another 3 and the dealer got another ace and a 5 for 17. Well I'm not playing again now until near the end. | | Read Entire Entry |
| Posted by: bing at September 16, 2001, 1:10 am | | Topic: Global Player 's NON-RANDOM Blackjack Winners... Forum: Winner Online |
Just saw this thread so I thought I would comment.
That winner list is real. Today I played for the gamemasters BJ tournament
1 bing 115.00 + 430.00 769 1,365.50 233.42% 39 minutes ago
2 Sirius170 50.00 76 113.50 227.00% 11 hours ago
3 Alfi 110.00 51 20.00 18.18% 13 hours ago
4 cccc 201.25 50 35.00 17.39% 13 hours ago
5 NICK249 75.00 189 6.50 8.67% 3 hours ago
MCRen651 70.00 45 0.00 0.00% 4 hours ago
6 Popeye13 50.00 90 0.00 0.00% 15 hours ago
Mike007 50.00 2 -4.00 -8.00% 4 hours ago
7 Wheelio 113.75 178 -15.00 -13.19% 7 hours ago
8 Jim401 50.00 50 -9.50 -19.00% 27 hours ago
9 tko 50.75 + 50.00 526 -78.50 -77.92% 3 hours ago
10 richard 708.75 + 1,500.00 490 -1,971.00 -89.24% 5 hours ago
I know 3 ppl on that list that are real as I have spoken to them.
I highly doubt that this casino "makes up" winners just to add to their list. In fact look at the whole tournament stats. One guy lost $2000. Now if a casino ... | | Read Entire Entry |
| Posted by: zrapture at September 12, 2001, 8:27 pm | | Topic: Global Player 's NON-RANDOM Blackjack Winners... Forum: Winner Online |
I'd have to side with Global Player on this one. After reading Sam's amalysis of both the winners list and payout %/month Sam loses a lot of credibility. Both those lists are within reason. Also loses credibility by slamming James who probably knows as much or more about gambling then anyone else on this board
| | Static Link |
| Posted by: 38Special at September 12, 2001, 7:58 pm | | Topic: Global Player 's NON-RANDOM Blackjack Winners... Forum: Winner Online |
Repost from 1st thread on this, I'm stickin by Global-Player on this one.
Well, I gotta get in on this one. I've played Global-Player for MONTHS now, almost everyday some. I had only one question when I started about how the cards came out when on a multiplayer table. That bothered me and still annoys me a little, but If anything, it leads me to believe it is ery random. For those who don't know what I'm talking about, Once the first two cards are out for everyone, it's sort of open season on hits from there. In other words, if the anchor person presses hit before the number one seat, he gets the next card out. Everyone is pressing hit and the cards come out in all different directions!!LMAO As Ted Hyatt explained,{and we all know}, There is no shoe of cards to play thru, every hand is a new shuffle. IT'S RANDOM and it helps to speed up play. Well of course he is right. This is why BlackJack online involves less skill and more luck than playin a land casino.
Now, I mostly play the 3 deck er... | | Read Entire Entry |
| Posted by: babe at September 12, 2001, 10:09 am | | Topic: Global Player 's NON-RANDOM Blackjack Winners... Forum: Winner Online |
The average player playes well below optimum. When a p machine is advertised at a certain payback percentage, it is assuming perfect play, which even the best players can't acheive. For a casino to ary a couple of perchantage points from month to month is not unusual. A couple of extra top jackpots on the higher denomination machines can change the number significantly as will less big jackpots will swing the results the other way.
| | Static Link |
| Posted by: Eldoodarino at September 12, 2001, 9:43 am | | Topic: Global Player 's NON-RANDOM Blackjack Winners... Forum: Winner Online |
"The average for January was 100.36%. The average for the five months since then is 98.58%. This is a drop of nearly 2%. (In January, pay outs were normal. RF’s and Deuces were randomly hit.)"
Rather it looks like there was a 2% SPIKE in January. Are you trying to complain about a 98% payout? Sam, maybe you should spend this energy addressing your gambling problem iinstead of putting the blame on the casino. If you can't stand the heat get out of the kitchen! People like you give our passtime a bad name.
| | Static Link |
| Posted by: sammcdon at September 12, 2001, 7:39 am | | Topic: Global Player 's NON-RANDOM Blackjack Winners... Forum: Winner Online |
It seems that only Global Player would finally reply to serious charges of lying, cheating, and deception at a time (9/12/01) when others are occupied with national morning. Although still in shock from the terriorist's cowardly acts in the United States, I feel I must respond to Global Player's ill-times remarks.
As I stated in my first evidence report, dated Aug 20, 2001: "I told them (Global Player) of my suspicions. I even offered to settle amicably until I encountered even more deception and lies." I was trying to be a nice guy. Obviously, nice doesn't work with Global Player management.
Yes, Global Player, you do change Random Number Generators at will:
Video Poker Payout Percentages at Global Player Casino for 2001:
Jan 100.36%
Feb 98.50
Mar 98.90
Apr 99.42
May 97.31
Jun 98.78
The average for January was 100.36%. The average for the five months since then is 98.58%. This is a drop of nearly 2%. (In January, pay outs were ... | | Read Entire Entry |
| Posted by: Global-Player at September 12, 2001, 4:49 am | | Topic: Global Player 's NON-RANDOM Blackjack Winners... Forum: Winner Online |
Reply to "sammmcdon":-
Although, this sort of ery naïve attempt to extort money from online casinos seems to be quite popular, it is unfortunate that they need to be aired in the public arena.
Sam has been threatening us with this for some time. His first attempt was on July 14, 2001 when he wrote a letter to us using ordinary mail. I think his audience should know the true facts of this case so I will attach his letter erbatim for people to draw their own conclusions.
Letter from sammcdon dated July 14th, 2001
__________________________________________________
______________________
“Dear Mr. Hayat,
I have proof that at least two random number generating devices were used by Global Player while I was playing the 25-cent deuces wild machine.
Reverse all the credit card charges for Sam McD****** and I will not say a word about this or criticize Global Player again online, ever.
Sincerely
sammcdon”
_______... | | Read Entire Entry |
| Posted by: sammcdon at September 5, 2001, 8:06 am | | Topic: Global Player 's NON-RANDOM Blackjack Winners... Forum: Winner Online |
My guess is that a new player does not come in from thin air, win $4200 in 10 minutes, and then disappear back into thin air.
Most players like to win now and then over a longer period of time. It is more realistic.
Nice pluck, but problem is not solved.
| | Static Link |
| Posted by: sammcdon at September 5, 2001, 5:26 am | | Topic: Global Player 's NON-RANDOM Blackjack Winners... Forum: Winner Online |
This is the third in a series of evidence reports about the Global Player Casino.
Why do casinos display lists of winners?
Most likely it is an attempt to convince prospective players that many people are winning large sums of money at their casino. To lie about this and deceive players is criminal.
Just because Global Player Casino deceives players by lying about its winners, doesn’t mean the casino is totally dishonest.
No, it does't mean the casino is totally dishonest. But, many players say this and I hold it to be true. If casino management lies to players or attempts to deceive or cheat them in one way, they are probably cheating, lying or deceiving in other ways.
The evidence is from the Global Player's own Winner's List:
BIGGEST BLACKJACK WINS IN JULY:
PLAYER GAME DATE & TIME WON
ny10010 LV S BJ 7/12/2001 16:29 $800
ny10010 LV D BJ 7/12/2001 16:50 $900
ny1001 LV D BJ 7/17/2001 17:48 $1,200
ny1001 LV D BJ 7/19/2001... | | Read Entire Entry |
|