| Posted by: garyzimmer at December 26, 2001, 4:45 pm | | Topic: Question for all gamblers Forum: Winner Online |
CPA-I took partial responsibility for the misunderstanding. Having done that, I didn't feel you owed me an apology.
If you insist, I accept! No hard feelings here! Let's just move on down the road....
| | Static Link |
| Posted by: Trader at December 26, 2001, 2:28 pm | | Topic: Question for all gamblers Forum: Winner Online |
One of the best parts of internet message boards is that you can kiss and makeup without exchanging bodily fluids. Can we all be friends now?
| | Static Link |
| Posted by: The_CPA at December 26, 2001, 11:10 am | | Topic: Question for all gamblers Forum: Winner Online |
Your funny!
Yep, I got plenty of coal for the winter now! LOL
------------------
http://www.CasinoPlayersAdvocate.com
[This message has been edited by The_CPA (edited 12-26-2001).]
| | Static Link |
| Posted by: AmateurSleuth at December 26, 2001, 8:14 am | | Topic: Question for all gamblers Forum: Winner Online |
I hope everyone had a nice Christmas. Some of you were not good kids, and Santa did not isit your house, I see.
Originally, this thread was about making money from bonuses, wasn't it?
In general, Gary was correct about the misleading T&C posted by quite a few casinos, both the honest and dishonest ones. Not to mention the merely "hard to understand" T&C's for casinos, like the Colosseum Group.
This point has been discussed here many times, and I would suggest that CasinoRep check back through posts in this forum for at least the past few weeks. You (and Gary) will get an idea of the "flava" of the board, and the posters here. You will also gain some aluable information.
Gary, your skills as a raconteur are appreciated, however, knowledge of gambling is much more aluable here. Misspellings are overlooked, but not required.
Your testosterone level is beyond your control, so we'll just have to take you as you are.
----------... | | Read Entire Entry |
| Posted by: The_CPA at December 26, 2001, 6:33 am | | Topic: Question for all gamblers Forum: Winner Online |
No that post doesn't make me angry and I don't want you to feel like you can not post and speak you mind. That would be a loss for everyone.
I gave you a sincere apology for my end of the misunderstanding.
Apparently though, you have not accepted it which is your choice. Nothing I can do about that.
I should have realized after the second post when you said you were sticking behind the statement that something was amiss.
I'm guessing you probably checked, doubled checked and pretty much have CRYPTO CASINO'S terms memorized by now. I can understand how that could have been frustrating.
So, with that in mind I will extend my apologies again for my imput into the misunderstanding.
------------------
http://www.CasinoPlayersAdvocate.com
| | Static Link |
| Posted by: garyzimmer at December 25, 2001, 10:16 pm | | Topic: Question for all gamblers Forum: Winner Online |
CPA--I should have realized immeditately what was going on when I saw the word 'Cryptologic'. I have played their casinos many times.
As I said to Caruso in an earlier post, both he and Martee were able to see both the 'forest and the trees' as opposed to you and me, simply making sure the target was lined up correctly in our gunsights.
Instead of jumping into the 'mix', I should have done some reading of posts and gotten more of a feel for what was being said and the language being used to say it.
I hope you'll be somewhat gentler with the next new guy and more forgiving of the 'inevitable' mistakes he will make. Caruso's post to you about the 'actor' comment made good sense. And, in turn, I shouldn't have taken the bait so readily.
I'll be posting some things on this board from time to time but I think I'm done with personal messages, for awhile at least. I'm going to lick my wounds and heal some.
If anything in this post makes you angry and hostile, I wil... | | Read Entire Entry |
| Posted by: Mrracetrack at December 25, 2001, 9:22 pm | | Topic: Question for all gamblers Forum: Winner Online |
The appropriate ending to this "conflict"
between CPA & Garyzimmer can be summed up
quite accurately in the words of
Gilda Radner, when in the character of
Emily Litella, she would say:
"NEVER MIND"
| | Static Link |
| Posted by: garyzimmer at December 25, 2001, 9:19 pm | | Topic: Question for all gamblers Forum: Winner Online |
Caruso--Your post to CPA made good sense.
He boiled me in oil and I reacted..., badly!
This attitude of 'taking the offensive' has worked well in the columns I have written, but it won't work on this board.
The 'tone' of your message to CPA is what works here, as well as the reasonable, common sense approach of Trader, Jetset and
Mrracetrack.
The ability of you and Martee, to stand back and see the trees 'and the forest' is also a special talent, and without it, CPA and I would still be throwing rocks at each other.
This message board business requires a maturity or an ability that, either I don't have or choose not to have, I'm not sure which yet.
I am going to continue to contribute to this board but not through personal messages of this type. Occasionally, I'll post something I have written, and read whatever comments are made. If, for some reason, that isn't acceptable, I'll stop doing that as well.
I told Trader 'I'm here to contribu... | | Read Entire Entry |
| Posted by: garyzimmer at December 25, 2001, 8:39 pm | | Topic: Question for all gamblers Forum: Winner Online |
Martee--You have my heartfelt thanks! Your insight without question, lifted a heavy burden from a back too 'puny' to carry it!
I saw references to Cryptologic in CPA's posts but had no inkling that we were talking about two different animals related only by being common to the same industry.
I must tell you, I was reluctant to turn on the computer today and go to the message board, anticipating a high level of heat inside a locked oven. Well, that's a little overboard, but I was apprehensive.
I assumed others, more familiar with CPA than myself, would come out in support of his stand. Instead, cooler heads than his or mine, prevailed, yours and Caruso's. I appreciate that and, I think CPA does also. I don't pretend to be able to speak for him but that would be my guess.
Perhaps I shouldn't bring this up but, Martee is indistinguishable as to 'gender' and I'm thinking how interesting all this would be if the cool head of a woman brought all this to a close after 'high ... | | Read Entire Entry |
| Posted by: The_CPA at December 25, 2001, 5:15 pm | | Topic: Question for all gamblers Forum: Winner Online |
You would think that Cryptologic somehow would have the word "Crypto" locked down?
I would guess that in the world of search engines, if someone searched for "Crypto Casinos"....They would stand a pretty good chance of winding up at Clock Media then. Would I be right on that?
Man.. That's pretty devious!
------------------
http://www.CasinoPlayersAdvocate.com
| | Static Link |
| Posted by: The Original Mary at December 25, 2001, 3:22 pm | | Topic: Question for all gamblers Forum: Winner Online |
Yes, you were both right, because Crypto Casino is the scum of the earth, recently opened to steal traffic from Cryptologic no doubt.
Cryptocasino is Clock Media, already shown to have gaffed games and trying to make a comeback with new software.
This is from their "about us" text; I consider it misleading. They are *not* in compliance with Nevada Gaming Commission rules and regulations.
"CryptoCasino.com - Online Gaming
CryptoCasino.com combines the latest state-of-the-art software with world class customer service to bring you the ultimate online gaming experience. Our games are lightning fast, stable, and secure, and are constantly monitored for integrity and fairness. We are currently the only online casino that is under complete compliance with the Nevada Gaming Commissions rules and regulations.
New Players Get 100% Free Money
Crypto Casino.com appreciates your business and will credit your account an additional 50% of your initial sign u... | | Read Entire Entry |
| Posted by: The_CPA at December 25, 2001, 11:58 am | | Topic: Question for all gamblers Forum: Winner Online |
Yep, he is looking at that odd ball java casino.Crypto
Mr. Zimmer,
Come on back! I do extend a heartfelt apology to you.
Crypto is routinely used here to reference Cryptologic.
I looked at the terms on this java casino and they are definately the ones he is talking about.
Damn Gary, I just feel terrible now! Please come on back! I will behave! I promise! LOL
------------------
http://www.CasinoPlayersAdvocate.com
| | Static Link |
| Posted by: The_CPA at December 25, 2001, 11:36 am | | Topic: Question for all gamblers Forum: Winner Online |
Well taken Caruso,
I had been brewin for a while because I had seen the dramtic post in the billboard section. So when I saw it moving over here, I decided I would stick up for the casino.
Now that you mention it, I recall something about a Crypto Casino. Certainly, if this is the case, We are arguing two different Casinos as you say! LOL
If that is the case, I would be the first to extend a heartfelt apology. Needless to say, when someone says Crypto, you associate to Cryptologic. I wonder if they know about this Crypto place. I think I'll go investigate and see if this is what Mr. Zimmer was refering to.
Geez, now I feel kind of bad, I was pretty rough on him! Glad it's Christmas and I was in a good mood!
------------------
http://www.CasinoPlayersAdvocate.com
| | Static Link |
| Posted by: Martee at December 25, 2001, 10:51 am | | Topic: Question for all gamblers Forum: Winner Online |
I think garyzimmer and CPA are talking about 2 different casinos. gary is talking about CryptoCasino (cryptocasino.com)....and CPA about Cryptologic casinos (Intercasino ..Sands..WmHill etc).
As CPA pointed out a Cryptologic bonus is instant and the bonus at Crypto Casino is not.
Maybe the people at Crypto Casino are trying to latch onto the good reputation that Cryptologic casino has earned through the good support and software.
| | Static Link |
| Posted by: caruso at December 25, 2001, 10:22 am | | Topic: Question for all gamblers Forum: Winner Online |
CPA - Gary HAS realized his mistake, but is not about to come out and say this directly, since a mild flaming war has erupted - originating, I think, from your comment "get a job as an actor"; why didn't you simply point out where his mistake came from? These bonus terms are EASILY misinterpreted, and Crypto aren't the only ones guilty of this; if I read "you must wager the deposit 12 times before receiving your bonus" (or something along those lines), this reads as "the bonus will not be GRANTED until the deposit has been sufficiently wagered", rather than "the bonus cannot be WITHDRAWN (having been instantly credited) until you've wagered the deposit 12 times."
A simple pointing out of Gary's mistake, without the "actor" comment as catalyst would have saved a HELL of a lot of trouble. It's ery easy to get over-excited and paranoid in this business (been there, done that) over matters which are usually simple misunderstandings. Those in the &qu... | | Read Entire Entry |
| Posted by: The_CPA at December 25, 2001, 6:55 am | | Topic: Question for all gamblers Forum: Winner Online |
I'll try one more time to get this thru to you.
This issue in question is NOT one that lends itself to an opinion.
This is the problem, Mr Zimmer, You do not have to wager 5Xs the Deposit and bonus to receive the bonus. Period. That is a fact, not a matter of opinion. The bonus is instant and given up front to use.
Just like EVERY bonus on the net, you must to meet the wager thru requirements before cashing it out! Surely you do understand this.
The only other thing that your post could imply, would be that you are under some sort of impression that Bonuses in online gambling are given freely and without cash in requirements. If that is the case, then you definately are not in tune with online Gambling.
I am telling you that you are incorrect in your continuous statement that the bonus at Cryptologic Casinos are not given until after the wager thru is met.
What is so hard for you to understand about that.
You have now stated several times... | | Read Entire Entry |
| Posted by: garyzimmer at December 25, 2001, 4:01 am | | Topic: Question for all gamblers Forum: Winner Online |
Hi CPA--Thanks again for expressing your 'delicate' diplomatic touch! Must have taken years to develop it. Your erbal personality reeks of multiple course
lessons from 'How to Make Friends and Influence People'! You say you passed the course? It may be time to go over some of your old notes!
I am not going to argue with you about Crypto Casino any further because repetition is boring. I have stated my opinion and I stand by it!
You have stated that I have no right to that opinion and should 'leave the earth'! That may well occur, but not at your urging.
In reference to your finding 'NO humor'.....that doesn't surprise me!
Sarcasm is a pretty big word for you! I'm impressed! I thought 'yuk' was more your style and, another good thing, you won't injure yourself pronouncing it.
No, Mr. Zimmer, I am responding directly to you and your posting of false and inaccurate information in a sarcastic and inflamatory mannor.
I find NO humor in someone that obvio... | | Read Entire Entry |
| Posted by: garyzimmer at December 25, 2001, 3:23 am | | Topic: Question for all gamblers Forum: Winner Online |
Jetset-- I'm ery new at this and have admitted an embryonic ulnerability. With you, Trader and Mrracetrack, I have experienced a measure of tolerance and patience, while I try to gather my parts into some sort 'correct procedural posting' order!
I have the feeling that CPA was poised and ready, hammer in hand, waiting for my head to emerge from the cracked shell of the egg!
Ouch! Now I'm wandering around, slightly dazed, trying to put together a gameplan. I was unsure of whether to start with defense or offense. I chose offense and I beleive that is what you are referring to as 'mocking'.
I guess I could erbally get on my knees and ask his forgiveness for having an opinion and the incredible audacity to offer it.
You have found CPA to be informed, helpful and reasonable! Who am I to judge? Perhaps he is! I don't expect the man to agree with me because I'm new, but it would be nice if he would 'slap me around' a little more gently because I'm new. Allow me to defend m... | | Read Entire Entry |
| Posted by: garyzimmer at December 25, 2001, 2:31 am | | Topic: Question for all gamblers Forum: Winner Online |
Woody--
However,the wording of their terms and conditions is ambiguous. This leads to disputes and questions of integrity on both sides.
Either they have no one capable of making the terms and conditions easily understood or, for some reason known only to them, they don't want them understood.
If we as players don't get upset when a casino's obvious intent is obfuscation, then we deserve the 'abuse' they hand out. If you haven't been a ictim of some of these poorly written 'terms and conditions', just go to gambling.com and click on 'gambling grumbles' and read about some of the bloodletting.
Go to a casino with well written 'terms and conditions' and then go to Crypto Casino and read theirs. If the difference isn't apparent then there is no hope!
| | Static Link |
| Posted by: Jetset at December 24, 2001, 10:22 pm | | Topic: Question for all gamblers Forum: Winner Online |
Who would have thought such an innocuous start would generate such a ibrant thread!
I'll offer one thing to you GZ - I have always found CPA to be a helpful, informed and reasonable poster who rarely gets as pissed as you seem to have managed to make him. Maybe there's something in what he says that is worth considering rather than mocking?
Having said that, welcome to the board - anyone who can get things off to such a lively start will undoubtedly add to the diversity of iews and interest here!
| | Static Link |
| Posted by: Woody0 at December 24, 2001, 9:43 pm | | Topic: Question for all gamblers Forum: Winner Online |
This post is way back but I merely wish to point out the error.
Quote: Originally Posted by garyzimmer:
[B].
In regard to my Crypto Casino post, having to play 5 times through is not much of a problem. My objection was their requirement that you must play 5 times through the 'deposit' and the 'bonus' before even awarding bonus. Read the following:
"No customer will be issued payment of their account balance plus the bonus (or promotional item) unless their betting activity exceeds at least five (5) times the amount of the initial deposit plus the bonus. In other words, if a player purchases $75.00 worth of chips, he/she is elegible to receive the bonus once he/she has bet 5 times the total of the deposit plus the bonus. $75 Deposit plus $75 Bonus = $150. Times 5 times = $750 of bets before they can have the bonus issued to their account."
They could have said the same thing in simpler terms by saying, 'you don't get the bonus until wagering your depos... | | Read Entire Entry |
| Posted by: The_CPA at December 24, 2001, 3:24 pm | | Topic: Question for all gamblers Forum: Winner Online |
No, Mr. Zimmer, I am responding directly to you and your posting of false and inaccurate information in a sarcastic and inflamatory mannor.
I find NO humor in someone that obviously has never played at Crypto Casino coming in here making a derogatory, sarcastic and untruthful remarks about something they haven't even taken the time to research.
You were so busy trying to overwhelm us with your clever writing, you forgot that someone might actually check the content.
You screwed up and I still hear no retractions or apologies for your posting of erroneous information.
As for last attack as to my credibility. Pardon Me, but You're the one that has a credibility problem. Why the hell do you think I'm so upset.
Anyone that would read your post on the Billboard would not even consider signing up at a Cryptologic Casino.
AND...
You're concerned about the player! You tell them not to play Crypto Casinos, eventhough they have just about the Best reputation of... | | Read Entire Entry |
| Posted by: garyzimmer at December 24, 2001, 2:47 pm | | Topic: Question for all gamblers Forum: Winner Online |
Mracetrack--
I appreciate the kind words! I've enjoyed the 'give and take' so far amd I'm learning
from both positive and negative posts.
Fitting in, without being phony or pushy, is apparently a delicate maneuver. Maybe down the road, I can help the 'next' new guy settle in without injury.
In regard to dealing with 'negative' replys to my posts, I have two weapons: I'm not afraid to admit when I'm wrong (I've had some practice) and hostility makes me 'creative'!
Thanks to you and Trader for making me feel welcome! Merry Xmas!
| | Static Link |
| Posted by: garyzimmer at December 24, 2001, 12:58 pm | | Topic: Question for all gamblers Forum: Winner Online |
Hi Trader--
I am highly appreciative of both the information and your willingness to provide it!
I have no agenda other than to 'learn' through the exchange of information with others posting on this board. I may have made a couple of procedural errors and I'm willing to absorb a few 'well aimed' kicks to my backside as atonement, but the kind of instruction you are administering will get me up to speed more effectively.
I guess I should have come up with some kind of nickname instead of using my acutal name. I'll look into getting that corrected.
I think I'm going to hang around, see if I can quell the hostility coming from CPA, and if I can't, learn to have some fun with it!
Have a great Xmas!
| | Static Link |
| Posted by: garyzimmer at December 24, 2001, 12:39 pm | | Topic: Question for all gamblers Forum: Winner Online |
CPA--
Everything I have written on this board or any other board, has been attributed to my name, Gary Zimmer.
I have no idea who CasinoRep is and, attributing my posts to him or his to me, is the same kind of b.s. accusations you so easily 'use' to welcome new people to this board!
Mellow out a little before you rupture something!
You, attributing my posts to CasinoRep, will likley upset him a bit! That result would be a blow to your reputation as a diplomat!
| | Static Link |
| Posted by: garyzimmer at December 24, 2001, 12:18 pm | | Topic: Question for all gamblers Forum: Winner Online |
Hi Guys--
Gets a little rough in here, doesn't it?
CPA is like some of the support people I have dealt with, he doesn't read the material or in some cases, doesn't understand it.
I've played well over 100 casinos and have accumulated a 'modest' amount of experience with online casinos. I don't claim to know any more than the most knowledgeable of you but I think it's likley that I know more than the least knowledgeable, and that one (singular) might also be the least courteous.
I stand by the post about Crypto Casino. Anyone who takes the time to read it, given the ability to understand what they are reading, will see my point.
I am new to this and likely have some things to learn about procedure. I'll do my best to get that done! CPA seems to feel a little threatened, hostility bubbling from every pore.
I haven't encountered that kind of reaction since, as a kid, moving to a new neighborhood and encountering the 'resident' bully! Maybe, down the r... | | Read Entire Entry |
| Posted by: The_CPA at December 24, 2001, 12:16 pm | | Topic: Question for all gamblers Forum: Winner Online |
Trying the Ole Peacemaker Thing on me HUH? You Rascal!
I did edit like 4 or 5 times. I was really pissed before I finalized it! lol
------------------
http://www.CasinoPlayersAdvocate.com
| | Static Link |
| Posted by: CasinoRep at December 24, 2001, 11:38 am | | Topic: Question for all gamblers Forum: Winner Online |
Hey guys! LOL I'm delighted that you're bashing me as the "bonus hunter"! It shows that there is still ample hopes from the minds and hearts of online gamblers.
I once market for gaming sites but grew weary and frustrated when my revenue kept showing "0" to negative due to these bastards manipulating the bonus system and cashing out, leaving no real gamblers. So then I thought what the heck? if you can't beat the enemy mind as well join them! I contemplated trying out the same tricks.
But now after reading all of your posts I think I will go back to siding with the casinos again.
| | Static Link |
| Posted by: Trader at December 24, 2001, 10:24 am | | Topic: Question for all gamblers Forum: Winner Online |
garyzimmer:
I am not sure how respected I am. That would be a question for others. I am sure that flattery works pretty well on me.
I first came to this board on a regular basis after losing $10,000(before bonus) at a casino I was sure had a defective blackjack game. I took quite a few negative comments about how I could do that, and they were not all undeserved. I always try to respond to other members here with respect and good humor. It can get a little rough here, but there is a lot of good information from experienced gamblers too.
You will soon see we have a large group of "spam igilantes" who are suspicious of new posters. They have been proven right too many times for them to stop now. They are also ery good at ferreting out people who hide behind a false identity to promote their own agendas. Most of us are anonymous so you should be a little suspicious of claims that cannot be proven.
Winneronline message boards can be a great tool if you follow a ... | | Read Entire Entry |
| Posted by: The_CPA at December 24, 2001, 7:58 am | | Topic: Question for all gamblers Forum: Winner Online |
This is the crap he posted on the Billboard for half the gambling Population to read.
Topic:
carrot and stick routine...rifling the passed out wino's pockets...
Inside post:
Crypto Casino:
Wouldn't you be iewed as being 'more forthright' if you just stated in your 'terms and conditions' that you require the deposit to be wagered 10 times as opposed to saying the 'deposit' and the 'bonus' (phantom) must be wagered 5 times, before you get the bonus.
Unusual approach! Very subtle 'carrot and stick' routine. You graciously offer the bonus and then 'swat' the recipient with the 'stick' when he can't make the bonus 'last' through the $750 in wagers! But, his beating is not over! Then you hit him again by saying he can't make another deposit to finally meet the wagering requirements!
He's into it for $75 and is short of the bonus! With a sly grin, you thumb your nose at him as you count your hard won, ill gotten gains!
Similar to rifling the pockets of a... | | Read Entire Entry |
| Posted by: caruso at December 24, 2001, 7:39 am | | Topic: Question for all gamblers Forum: Winner Online |
Yes - he should do his own dirty work as far as sniffing out good deals go; there should, indeed, be no "free lunch". But I don't think clarification of the T & Cs comes in that category.
Casino rep: A $10 "freebie" is pretty inconsequential. Some are "tokens", ie. never withdrawable, but you can win with them. Others are "real", but may require a few play-throughs if you're the sort of tight-fisted scrounger who'd cash out $10 - although, given minimum withdrawal levels, such a small cashout is usually impossible.
If it says "$75 for $50", that's what it means - no more, no less, unless otherwisew stated.
If it says "100%" then it will be capped, typically between $50 and $100
| | Static Link |
| Posted by: The_CPA at December 24, 2001, 7:34 am | | Topic: Question for all gamblers Forum: Winner Online |
You don't gamble, but you write articles about gambling.
You come in here and Immediately start bashing, in full melodramatic form, what is without question the foremost leader in online gambling where Honesty and Integrity are involved.
You make this dramatic Bullshxt public statement in a well read section of the MOST read Gambling Portal on the Internet that is completely inaccurate and false!
You call yourself a columnist. Why don't you try writing about something you know something about instead of bashing good casinos with your uninformed BS.
Try playing some casinos and then come here when you something of alue to contribute.
YOUR STATEMENT!{In full Melodrama on the Billboard}
"My objection was their requirement that you must play 5 times through the 'deposit' and the 'bonus' before even awarding bonus"
Now Mr. Gambling Shark, for your information, the Cryptologic bonus is instant. No lines, no waiting.
A Major misrepres... | | Read Entire Entry |
| Posted by: Mrracetrack at December 24, 2001, 2:36 am | | Topic: Question for all gamblers Forum: Winner Online |
CasinoRep,
You posted "Hey thanks for your replies guys. Perhaps I didn't state myself clearly. You see I don't gamble at all. What I'm interested is this new bonus advantage created by online gaming sites. I'm talking about hitting your bonuses and run. The "bonus hunting" game.
Your looking for a "crash course" on how
to "scam" casino's. Do your own "dirty work"!
It's people like you that create many of the "problems" that plague this industry.
Alway's looking for "something for nothing".
Did you ever hear the saying
"There's no such thing as a free lunch"??
Well, due to "players" like you, the "free lunch" is pretty much history now.
Then you post; "Pertaining to those casinos offering matchup bonuses and deposit bonuses. I know they each have different terms and conditions. However, let's say casino a offer $75 free bonus for the initial $50 deposit. Does... | | Read Entire Entry |
| Posted by: Mrracetrack at December 24, 2001, 1:30 am | | Topic: Question for all gamblers Forum: Winner Online |
Response to GaryZimmer....
You posted "I kind of wish I hadn't brought up the 'column' thing. I will likley get beat over the head for having done so. I would prefer to simply be considered someone who
'may' occasionally have something worthwhile to contribute and, in turn, am enthusiastically eager to learn from others."
You won't get "Beat over the head" for mentioning your column. It's gambling related, and you were not "advertising" it.
I asked about it. I went to "the pit", and read it. Decent article.
As far as your comment that you "'may' occasionally have something worthwhile to contribute and, in turn, am enthusiastically eager to learn from others.", well,
that's what this board is for, and what you
have posted so far is just fine. If someone
doesn't like something you post, or disagrees
with you, so what. That certainly happens quite a bit on this board. Makes for
"interesting" ... | | Read Entire Entry |
| Posted by: CasinoRep at December 24, 2001, 1:25 am | | Topic: Question for all gamblers Forum: Winner Online |
Alright folks I got 2 questions for ya:
1) Regarding the casinos that offer bonuses without purchases necessary. Literally this means that you just need to download the software and free-play for x amount of times each term requires. Any catches to this?
2) Pertaining to those casinos offering matchup bonuses and deposit bonuses. I know they each have different terms and conditions. However, let's say casino a offer $75 free bonus for the initial $50 deposit. Does this mean if I deposit $100 then I'll receive $150 bonus? And let's say casino B offers a 100% matchup for my $100 deposit. What if I deposit $10,000, or $100,000 for that matter, will I receive 100% of whatever amount I purchase?
Thanks!
| | Static Link |
| Posted by: garyzimmer at December 24, 2001, 12:41 am | | Topic: Question for all gamblers Forum: Winner Online |
MRRACETRACK-(I hope I have that right)
I write for GambleShark. My columns will appear in 3 other gambling portals after the first of the year.
This may sound a little 'hollow' at this point, but my intent in participating in the messages appearing on this site, is to learn more from the player's perspective. Almost everything I write is an effort to advance the player's cause. That sounds much more 'noble' than I really am, since I am a player and most of what I have written has been to advance my own cause as well.
I kind of wish I hadn't brought up the 'column' thing. I will likley get beat over the head for having done so. I would prefer to simply be considered someone who
'may' occasionally have something worthwhile to contribute and, in turn, am enthusiastically eager to learn from others.
Now, I think I've taken up enough space on this board for one day!
| | Static Link |
|