| Posted by: aetos at June 18, 2005, 2:13 am | | Topic: City Club Casino Forum: Winner Online |
Hello,
First prefer live roulette, where the casino software cant change results against your play. Ok, it is slow but if you check you will notice it gives the same results all over playtech casinos and thats ery important.
Second, never mind table limits as they are temporary! If you happen to win you will find new smaller table limits! (has happened to me at USA casino and its partners! Avoid them, as they will give u trouble on WR etc)
I had tried once City Club (not for roulette) and they gave me a nice bonus (online support gives better bonuses than the site), but the wagering requirements were too high.
Good luck
| | Static Link |
| Posted by: bonuslover at June 17, 2005, 8:09 am | | Topic: City Club Casino Forum: Winner Online |
I have the least confidence in Playtech and I don't think many roulette players here will prefer Playtech.
If you are only after high table limits, try www.luckynugget.com or www.32red.com, even some RTGs are willing to change the limits to suit you if you phone them.
Do you really wanna lose that fast?
| | Static Link |
| Posted by: dbrock at June 15, 2005, 1:03 pm | | Topic: City Club Casino Forum: Winner Online |
I've looked at a lot of messages at this site but have not seen many on City Club Casino and these were generally related to negative comments on all casinos that use the Playtech software. I am interested in City Club because they told me that their max roulette bet is $300 and this is what the game table layout shows both for "funny" and real money play. However I've checkes several other Playtech casinos (USA Kiwi New Yorker) and while their "funney" money max bets are also $300, when you select real money, the max bet is $50 or less. $300 seems ery high and seems to me would be ery tempting to "rig" the Playtech software in favor of the casino as bets get larger when playing progressive bet systems. I would appreciate any comments, positive or negative, that members have on City Club, it's reputation, bonus wager requiremente before cash outs, time for pay outs. and any other aspects of their operation Thanks a bundle.
| | Static Link |
| Posted by: Gamblegirl at December 7, 2003, 3:58 am | | Topic: City Club Casino Forum: Winner Online |
It was not my intention to "make you look foolish", and I should have gone further than "sorry Jetset" as that obviously was taken the wrong way. Rather I wanted to point to the irony of what happened back then, and yes it was way off the topic but coming across it again I thought it would be of some interest to readers who are not aware of what later happened and may pursue the historical record further. In such a way others should greet anyone they encounter online with a certain degree of healthy skepticism and that many are not who they appear and have other interests besides those they claim.
Sorry to have singled you out but you were the only one who stood up to be counted, as you usually do, and are man enough now to admit your mistakes while others continually shrink away from controversies and shirk their responsibilities.
And for the record, I was an OPA member for a couple of years, paying my $25 and was generally quite pleased with the responsiveness... | | Read Entire Entry |
| Posted by: Jetset at December 6, 2003, 10:55 pm | | Topic: City Club Casino Forum: Winner Online |
Gamblegirl clearly has a superabundance of time at her disposal judging by the amount of old material and quotes she habitually digs up and re-posts here whether relevant to a discussion or no. And it is not hard to find three years or older quotes that look odd in today's context with the benefit of 20/20 hindsight.
Such is the case with Adkins, whose subsequently exposed behaviour I abhor.
My judgement (and that of others) was totally out of whack when it came to this crook and I am embarrassed by that mistake whenever a detractor brings up this historical stuff, presumably in attempts to make me look foolish.
I was taken in by him, no question and mainly because he did at one time help hundreds of stiffed players to get their money, although his rather coarse flaming style did make me cringe on occasion.
So enjoy my present relived embarrassment with your mean-spirited post, Gamblegirl - I hope your own anonymous persona is as error-free as you require othe... | | Read Entire Entry |
| Posted by: Gamblegirl at December 6, 2003, 12:54 pm | | Topic: City Club Casino Forum: Winner Online |
This is pretty far removed from the subject at hand but for curiosity I did a search to see if this term ("bonus seeker") had been used before at WOL. Surprisingly it had, the first instance being almost three years ago in a post by luckyme.
In a thread entitled "OPA Database of Dishonest Players", Steve Adkins (Samuel Ashley Jr ) was proposing a blacklist of players who were committing fraud, chargebacks, and using fake identities. There was some resistance to the idea as the players expressed the idea that it would become a list of "bonus abusers". One poster ("luckyme") challenged Adkins on it in some long-winded, meandering posts but was met with derision by the head of the OPA. Frustrated, I think by some "colourful" replies, "luckyme" asked if Adkins was "hiding something" because of his refusal to answer her questions directly but he would say "If you do not like how rude I am please feel free to leave in a huff... | | Read Entire Entry |
| Posted by: hhcfreebie at December 5, 2003, 7:22 pm | | Topic: City Club Casino Forum: Winner Online |
They sent me the same offer as well but I didn't take it. After seeing so many players were labeled as "bonus xxx", I don't want to waste my time with this junk group.
Although it's also the only place I've ever hit a royal, I'll never ever go back.
I think this casino group is sinking.
| | Static Link |
| Posted by: gamblinboi at December 5, 2003, 5:27 pm | | Topic: City Club Casino Forum: Winner Online |
Quote: Originally Posted by ohdreampop
I liked this place because I received my first royal there last month. However, I received a promo in my email for their "2nd Birthday Bash" for a $50 match bonus and I deposited $50 today for it. I didn't receive my bonus, so I contacted customer service ia phone. They told me that they thought the bonus would be credited tomorrow but "weren't familiar with the promo because it isn't ery clear" HA! They told me to contact live chat becuase they knew more about it. uhhh... okay.
So, I contacted live chat and they told me that bonuses are not credited to those accounts that are labeled "bonus seekers" and he's sorry but he couldn't help me. I told him that the promo was emailed DIRECTLY to me by their casino (not an affiliate). He told me that he'd take my name off their list so I don't get spammed by them. This is bull because I was offered a promo and then denied after I deposited. Now I have to wait god knows ho... | | Read Entire Entry |
| Posted by: ohdreampop at December 5, 2003, 5:15 pm | | Topic: City Club Casino Forum: Winner Online |
I liked this place because I received my first royal there last month. However, I received a promo in my email for their "2nd Birthday Bash" for a $50 match bonus and I deposited $50 today for it. I didn't receive my bonus, so I contacted customer service ia phone. They told me that they thought the bonus would be credited tomorrow but "weren't familiar with the promo because it isn't ery clear" HA! They told me to contact live chat becuase they knew more about it. uhhh... okay.
So, I contacted live chat and they told me that bonuses are not credited to those accounts that are labeled "bonus seekers" and he's sorry but he couldn't help me. I told him that the promo was emailed DIRECTLY to me by their casino (not an affiliate). He told me that he'd take my name off their list so I don't get spammed by them. This is bull because I was offered a promo and then denied after I deposited. Now I have to wait god knows how long before I get my deposit back.
Oh... | | Read Entire Entry |
|