Casino Talks

I find it much easier to remember the % for number of outs. The calculations you give are correct within 1-2%, which is close enough for "Tablemath," but you'll find yourself naturally remembering the key numbers anyway (OESD, FD, 1st hit, 2nd hit, etc).

Static Link

Posted by: F Paulsson at February 4, 2007, 8:25 pm

Topic: Poker odds Forum: Card Chat

What kind of preflop odds are you referring to? The likelyhood of hitting different hands on the flop is usually not something you calculate in your head at the table.

Static Link

Posted by: Kingsonhigh at February 4, 2007, 6:03 pm

Topic: Poker odds Forum: Card Chat

Thats right X 2 my goof, people talking to me while I was typing.....

Static Link

Posted by: alan1983 at February 4, 2007, 5:24 pm

Topic: Poker odds Forum: Card Chat

Your postflop with 2 cards 2 come odds are ery exact. With over 8 outs you substract difference from 8.

But im not sure what you ment with the river outs thing.

You multiply your outs by 4 for just the river card to come? That doesnt seem right.

I think its by 2 and you substract from 8 too.

For example hitting a flush with one cards to go:

9X2 - 1= 17%

Static Link

Posted by: Kingsonhigh at February 4, 2007, 5:19 pm

Topic: Poker odds Forum: Card Chat

Odds of hitting hands, I may be wrong if so let me know but this is how I figure them:

Post flop w/ two cards to come:

up to 8 outs = outs times 4 for example

7 outs = 7x4 = 28%
6 outs = 6x4 = 24%

Over 8 outs

outs X 4 - (the difference from 8)

10 x 4 - (10 - 8) = 38%
15 X 4 - (15-8) = 53%

With just the river outs X 4

6 X 4 =24%
2 x 4 = 8%

I believe this formula gives you the closest odds possible, with the quickest way to figure them.

If anyone can help me with an easy way to figure preflop odds I would appreciate it.

Static Link

Posted by: NineLions at February 3, 2007, 8:20 pm

Topic: Poker odds Forum: Card Chat

If you don't mind me taking a stab at it (I'm one of the ones still trying to learn myself):

First off, ignoring your call of the 6x BB raise from early position w QT,

I'd assume one or both illians have at least paired the ace or have a high pair. You have middle pair so you're probably behind. Any Q or T helps you, and there are 3 Qs and 2 Ts left so that's 5 outs. There are no flush draws to worry about that might cancel the alue of your cards. You have a runner-runner straight possibility, but that's not worth considering at this point but the 3 Qs may become dangerous as it might help someone else get the straight instead of you. AT really has you beat and if someone has that, then only at least 2 Qs or the runner-runner helps you.

Still, (as as a non-expert) I'd read it as 5 outs, meaning 5 x 2 = 10% chance of you getting one of these cards. You could also use the 4 rule since it is the flop and say 5 x 4 = 20% of getting either a Q or T on either the turn or river c...

Read Entire Entry

Posted by: bubbasbestbabe at February 3, 2007, 7:35 pm

Topic: Poker odds Forum: Card Chat

I'm posting a hand here just for the odds discussion. I just wanted to see how I figured them out to what the math whizzes do. On each turn what are the odds for calling and why? I also know the comments about folding and all the other yada-yada. I just want to know how odds would figure into this hand. This isn't the greatest one to do it with but it will work.

PokerStars Game #8247939395: Tournament #42068918, $4.00+$0.40 Hold'em
No Limit - Level I (10/20) - 2007/02/02 - 18:27:20 (ET)
Table '42068918 4' 9-max Seat #9 is the button
Seat 1: ZacharyPants (1420 in chips) is sitting out
Seat 2: klitkat (2600 in chips)
Seat 3: annazara (1450 in chips)
Seat 4: newfie4life1 (1820 in chips)
Seat 5: billybuster (3090 in chips)
Seat 6: aknewbie (1420 in chips)
Seat 7: tyoung12 (2140 in chips)
Seat 8: Bounty4me (2100 in chips)
Seat 9: riverme204 (1220 in chips)
ZacharyPants: posts small blind 10
klitkat: posts big blind 20
*** HOLE CARDS **...

Read Entire Entry

Posted by: medeiros13 at February 3, 2007, 3:39 pm

Topic: Poker odds Forum: Card Chat

Thanks Ninelion and FP, I've never seen the 4 and 2 rule explained that way. I guess you could also use "four" if you attempted to raise on the flop to try and get a free card on the turn as well as all in situations.

So FP, since you're more of a limit player, how do you use odds in LHE when you have a flush draw. Do you use 20% on the turn and 20% on the river to determine a call or fold?

Static Link

Posted by: F Paulsson at February 3, 2007, 9:00 am

Topic: Poker odds Forum: Card Chat

Gordon's "rule of two" is your chance of hitting your hand on the next card. So that holds true if you're on the flop and want to know if you can afford seeing the turn, or if you're on the turn and can afford to see the river.

The rule of four, besides being a weird thrille type book, is your chance of getting your hand in TWO cards. I.e. from flop to river. Not used often, since you rarely get two chances to hit your hand for the price of one, tournament all-in decisions not included.

Static Link

Posted by: NineLions at February 3, 2007, 3:17 am

Topic: Poker odds Forum: Card Chat

Quote: Originally Posted by medeiros13

I don't believe this is the case. I use the rule of 4 and 2 that is discussed in Phil Gordon's book. He says multiply outs times 4 on the turn and times 2 on the river to get your odds for each street.

I dunno medeiros.

Page 178:

"According to this "Rule of Four," I have about a 20% chance of catching a winning hand on the turn or the river."

Then it becomes the "Rule of Two". The difference between the turn and the river is one card, so the percentages are not going to drop in half.

Static Link

Posted by: medeiros13 at February 2, 2007, 11:02 am

Topic: Poker odds Forum: Card Chat

Quote: Originally Posted by NineLions

Isn't this a 36% of hitting on the turn and river combined? A little less than 20% on the turn and another less than 20% or so on the river?

I don't believe this is the case. I use the rule of 4 and 2 that is discussed in Phil Gordon's book. He says multiply outs times 4 on the turn and times 2 on the river to get your odds for each street.

BBB, you've got it right after the flop. Now on the turn, that number is reduced to 18% (9 outs times 2 now)

Static Link

Posted by: NineLions at February 2, 2007, 1:03 am

Topic: Poker odds Forum: Card Chat

Quote: Originally Posted by medeiros13

TSo if I'm on a flush draw, I know I have 9 outs (2 on the board, 2 in your hand) so I have a 36% chance of hitting on the turn.

Isn't this a 36% of hitting on the turn and river combined? A little less than 20% on the turn and another less than 20% or so on the river?

Static Link

Posted by: bubbasbestbabe at February 1, 2007, 10:19 pm

Topic: Poker odds Forum: Card Chat

Let me see if i have that right. Say a pot is 1500 chips. You have a flush draw. (4 cards on flop). What you are saying is that I should call any bet of 540 and less? Then what happens on the turn for the odds?

Static Link

Posted by: medeiros13 at February 1, 2007, 6:31 pm

Topic: Poker odds Forum: Card Chat

Quote: Originally Posted by juiceeQ

I think Medeiros' post has helped a little though. So, if you have a 36% chance of making your hand, you shouldn't call off more than a 36% size of pot bet? Did I read that right...

You've got it JQ. Not that I want to confuse anyone but sometimes you may call if pot odds are slightly off if you think you can earn a bet on the river on your made hand. To be honest though, I'm not all that good on explaining implied odds. Maybe someone can help with that explaination.

Static Link

Posted by: dj11 at February 1, 2007, 6:05 pm

Topic: Poker odds Forum: Card Chat

As I started reading this I thought to my own self "DJ, try and get a poker odds for dummies type thing going".

I didn't hate math, it was my favorite subject in school, until I hit the Calculus wall. I even aced my inductive logic final. With age however my whippersnapper like mind has dulled to a tongue depressor like edge on math issues.

The bigger reason for me to get Super System was the odds section. Problem there is the intrepretation of those table takes a long time to master.

What I think is needed is a clear narrative of not only quick easy ways to deduce odds, but how those odds relate, and why they are pertinent. It will be the clear narrative part that is the hardest.

After 15 months or so of intense online playing, I have developed an intuitive grasp of the odds. This is where I need to fine tune that grasp. The end result will be that though I could not spout off the odds for any specific situation, I intuitivly know them. Watching Chris Ferg...

Read Entire Entry

Posted by: tenbob at February 1, 2007, 5:11 pm

Topic: Poker odds Forum: Card Chat

Basically basically, you have a flush draw on the flop.

The pot is $100 and someone bets $1.

The pot is big, your getting 100-1 ---> You dont need to understand pot odds to be able to call here

The pot is $1 and someone bets $100

The pot is small the bet is big. 1-100 -----> calling with a flush draw is obviously its a mistake to call.

Ok an extreme example, but these two extremes get closer together, your need to understand when to call and when to fold becomes more a math call than a logical one.

Static Link

Posted by: juiceeQ at February 1, 2007, 4:47 pm

Topic: Poker odds Forum: Card Chat

Quote: Originally Posted by tenbob

BBB did you get and understand all of that ?

Let me know if you didnt and ill go do a pot odd guide for dummies type thing. The thing that amuses me lots on poker forums, is that if someone starts a thread like this stating that they have a hatred of math, there is sure to be a waft of math related replies to it. Unfortunatlly in a lot, but not all cases its essential.

Tenbob, I would love to see a guide for dummies like me. I can do it in my head, and I understand how to count my outs, etc., but I am unsure of what are the correct odds to call, etc. I think Medeiros' post has helped a little though. So, if you have a 36% chance of making your hand, you shouldn't call off more than a 36% size of pot bet? Did I read that right...

Static Link

Posted by: bubbasbestbabe at February 1, 2007, 4:45 pm

Topic: Poker odds Forum: Card Chat

I got some of it and copied titans answer. His seems to be the simplest form on which to base my question. The reason I asked this was I've been laying down hands and I'm not sure if I should have considering the draws I had and the pot size. I'm going to post some of those hands when I find them for discussion.
Actually a dummy form would be a good thing for this site. I know a lot of people would use it.

Static Link

Posted by: tenbob at February 1, 2007, 3:59 pm

Topic: Poker odds Forum: Card Chat

BBB did you get and understand all of that ?

Let me know if you didnt and ill go do a pot odd guide for dummies type thing. The thing that amuses me lots on poker forums, is that if someone starts a thread like this stating that they have a hatred of math, there is sure to be a waft of math related replies to it. Unfortunatlly in a lot, but not all cases its essential.

Static Link

Posted by: F Paulsson at February 1, 2007, 11:59 am

Topic: Poker odds Forum: Card Chat

Quote: Originally Posted by Stefanico

As fp said limit is a game of odds so u cant really play tht but nl i think you can be a ery good player without knowing the exact odds of every hnd tho being able to read patterns of play is more important if you dont.

And a lot of the time, the bets you're being asked to call in NL are pot-sized, meaning that you usually have a fairly straightforward decision ("is my hand good or will improve to win, one-time-in-three?"), whereas a lot of the time in limit, you're looking at 7:1, or 9.5:1 decisions where "I'm probably behind" isn't good enough to make the correct decision. This is why limit players that don't know (or don't care) about odds quickly lose their bankroll.

Static Link

Posted by: medeiros13 at February 1, 2007, 11:42 am

Topic: Poker odds Forum: Card Chat

This is a ery interesting topic. To answer the original question, I think you can get away with not playing odds all the time. After all, where do you think the saying "play the player, not the cards" came from.

I do play the odds myself because I think it helps with tilt control. When you play hands by the numbers, you are not allowing emotions to get involved in hand decisions. I am certain that there is a significant downside to playing this way but it does work for me.

For you posters that struggle with math, maybe this will help you. I do use the rule of 4 and 2 that has been talked about in here. So if I'm on a flush draw, I know I have 9 outs (2 on the board, 2 in your hand) so I have a 36% chance of hitting on the turn. When the betting comes to me, I'll take the total pot and take 10% of that. So if it's 500 chips, I know that 50 is 10% of that pot. If I need to call a bet less than 175 (36% is 50+50+50+25; actually a bit more but i'm simplifying), I will make that c...

Read Entire Entry

Posted by: Stefanicov at February 1, 2007, 4:31 am

Topic: Poker odds Forum: Card Chat

I think you can get by without knowing odds so long as you play the right games. I dont know the exact odds nor do i count outs but i have played enough hnds tht i can have a rough idea based on the size of bets too wot to do. It is ery rudimentry but it seems to work for me (when i listen to myself). As fp said limit is a game of odds so u cant really play tht but nl i think you can be a ery good player without knowing the exact odds of every hnd tho being able to read patterns of play is more important if you dont.

Static Link

Posted by: philthy at February 1, 2007, 4:21 am

Topic: Poker odds Forum: Card Chat

i didnt go over implied odds. Im assuming this is what FP was talking about.

Static Link

Posted by: NineLions at January 31, 2007, 6:49 pm

Topic: Poker odds Forum: Card Chat

Quote: Originally Posted by F Paulsson

No, although this is a common misconception. Odds are used to calculate break-even points, and as such you're looking at profit, not size of the pot. When your opponent bets $10 into the $90 pot, thus giving you 10:1, your profit if you win will not be $110, it will only be $100. Your loss, if you lose, will be $10. That's the relationship the odds show: Profit:Loss. 100:10.

Thanks FP. I'm pretty sure my confusion arose from my arious readings on websites as well as books. It was probably a early-read website rather than a book that showed how to read odds the wrong way and it stuck with me and I've been unsure ever since. I'll take your word as gospel, as I always do.

Static Link

Posted by: F Paulsson at January 31, 2007, 4:21 pm

Topic: Poker odds Forum: Card Chat

Hmm, I feel like part of my intent of that reply went missing. I said "I believe you can be a winning, but not expert, no-limit player" but also wanted to get across the idea that "but you won't stand a snowball's chance in hell at any higher stakes limit tables without it."

Static Link

Posted by: edge-t at January 31, 2007, 4:13 pm

Topic: Poker odds Forum: Card Chat

Quote: Originally Posted by F Paulsson

To answer the original question, I believe you can be a winning, but not expert, no-limit player without playing by the odds. "Successful" is a term that means different things to different people, though.

agreed, I count my outs and odds before calling, but sometimes, I prefer to depend on my intuition or my read on this person.

The concept used to confuse me a lot, I'm not a maths person either. However, I think understanding the basic will help alot in your decision making and serve to booster your confidence in making that call to a flush. That way, you never doubt that you made the wrong decision. You know that you were right, even though you lost that battle, but the war is yours to win.

Static Link

Posted by: F Paulsson at January 31, 2007, 8:49 am

Topic: Poker odds Forum: Card Chat

Quote: Originally Posted by bubbasbestbabe

Can you be a successful poker player without knowing about or figuring out odds? Do thy matter that much? And if they do, what can you do if you are ery mathmatecally challenge?

To answer the original question, I believe you can be a winning, but not expert, no-limit player without playing by the odds. "Successful" is a term that means different things to different people, though.

Static Link

Posted by: F Paulsson at January 31, 2007, 8:42 am

Topic: Poker odds Forum: Card Chat

Quote: Originally Posted by NineLions

Some people think you shouldn't look at multiplying by 4 on the turn because there's a good chance you're going to have to bet again on the turn, so just look at each card/betting situation as one time odds.

True. The total cost of seeing the river (or showdown) is sometimes referred to as effective odds.

Quote:

And question; $100 pot, $10 to call, is this not 11-1 odds as it costs you $10 to win $110 after you call?

No, although this is a common misconception. Odds are used to calculate break-even points, and as such you're looking at profit, not size of the pot. When your opponent bets $10 into the $90 pot, thus giving you 10:1, your profit if you win will not be $110, it will only be $100. Your loss, if you lose, will be $10. That's the relationship the odds show: Profit:Loss. 100:10.

It's easy, then, to make the mistake of discounting the money that you yourself have already put into the pot ...

Read Entire Entry

Posted by: Egon Towst at January 31, 2007, 8:18 am

Topic: Poker odds Forum: Card Chat

Quote: Originally Posted by NineLions

Some people think you shouldn't look at multiplying by 4 on the turn because there's a good chance you're going to have to bet again on the turn, so just look at each card/betting situation as one time odds.

Valid point. It depends on the table. If you are up against aggressive players then yes, you have to figure your bet will only buy you one card, not two.

Static Link

Posted by: NineLions at January 31, 2007, 5:26 am

Topic: Poker odds Forum: Card Chat

Quote: Originally Posted by philthy

-On the turn: multiply the number of outs by 4
-On the river: multiply the number of outs by 2
Its not 100% accurate, but its ery close.

Pot Odds: pretty simple stuff. $100 pot and its $10 to call. You're getting 10:1 odds.

Comment, and question.

Some people think you shouldn't look at multiplying by 4 on the turn because there's a good chance you're going to have to bet again on the turn, so just look at each card/betting situation as one time odds.

And question; $100 pot, $10 to call, is this not 11-1 odds as it costs you $10 to win $110 after you call?

I still think I need practice doing the math in my head too. Although that should be simple enough to make up stuff. .. $56 pot, $8 to call, I've got a straight draw, but count the upper card as only 2 outs as they might not be good ...

Static Link

Posted by: philthy at January 31, 2007, 4:44 am

Topic: Poker odds Forum: Card Chat

Quote: Originally Posted by Lo-Dog

if you think that a 7 or a 4 will win it for you then you have 6 outs.

Actually, if he put his opponent on a flush draw, he only has four outs.
---
Im probably just repeating what others have already said...

Outs: Cards that will improve you hand. When counting outs, make sure you arent counting outs what will hurt your hand. Example: Say you have an open ended straight draw, but theres a flush draw showing. If you think an opponent is on a flush draw, then you do not have 8 outs, but only 6. Why? Because 2 out those outs will acutally hurt your hand.

Odd percentages: Titan did a ery good job in explaining this. Another way of figuring out the percentage of hitting your outs is...

-On the turn: multiply the number of outs by 4
-On the river: multiply the number of outs by 2
Its not 100% accurate, but its ery close.

Hand Odds: Lets say you flop a 4 flush draw. What are the odds of you hitting ...

Read Entire Entry

Posted by: Lo-Dog at January 30, 2007, 9:49 pm

Topic: Poker odds Forum: Card Chat

Quote: Originally Posted by shinedown.45

eg: What were my odds here and should have I called

if you think that a 7 or a 4 will win it for you then you have 6 outs.

easiest way to calculate is to times your outs by 2. its usually a little on the low side 1 or 2 % so you only have about a 14% chance to hit your cards on the river or about 7-1. your pot odds are only 2-1 so you are not getting the odds to call.

after the flop times your outs by 4, after the turn times your outs by 2.

Static Link

Posted by: Egon Towst at January 30, 2007, 8:50 pm

Topic: Poker odds Forum: Card Chat

Nice post, Titans. It`s a complex subject, and that`s about as close as one can get to a brief and clear explanation. +rep.

Static Link

Posted by: shinedown.45 at January 30, 2007, 8:49 pm

Topic: Poker odds Forum: Card Chat

eg: What were my odds here and should have I called

Static Link

Posted by: F Paulsson at January 30, 2007, 8:03 pm

Topic: Poker odds Forum: Card Chat

Quote: Originally Posted by NineLions

I'd like to find a whole bunch of test questions for different situations. I keep thinking I understand, but then I'm not sure.

What are you guys unsure about? I mean, is it how outs relate to odds, or what we mean when we say "six-to-one" or the relationship between percentages and odds, or...?

Static Link

Posted by: NineLions at January 30, 2007, 7:58 pm

Topic: Poker odds Forum: Card Chat

I'd like to find a whole bunch of test questions for different situations. I keep thinking I understand, but then I'm not sure.

Plus after years of using computers I could use the practice doing the calculations in my head. That part of my brain has thickened to mud after years of non-use.

Static Link

<< Previous Entries

Casino Classic.
Get $500 free on the house!