| Posted by: Cha Ngo at April 5, 2005, 10:25 pm | | Topic: which poker site is the easiest to play at? Forum: Bonus Whores | proxybot wrote: I wonder what kind of money Full Tilt is paying these pros to play $1/2 and $2/4 at 3 AM when they could be playing their normal $10k/20k games. I haven't seen Jen Harmon on yet, but the rest are pretty regular.
I think you have stumbled upon the secret of what makes full tilt so very soft. Naturally, when the pros are playing their "A" game, they are at these high stakes tables. However, when they are running bad they move on down to the 1-2 limit tables. Easy pickings.
_________________
I'm gonna change my name to Hannibal
Or maybe just Rex | | Static Link |
| Posted by: SynthTrance at April 5, 2005, 3:31 am | | Topic: which poker site is the easiest to play at? Forum: Bonus Whores | proxybot wrote: I wonder what kind of money Full Tilt is paying these pros to play $1/2 and $2/4 at 3 AM when they could be playing their normal $10k/20k games. I haven't seen Jen Harmon on yet, but the rest are pretty regular.
Maybe just some worker or even... a bot?
But anyways, yeah, seems like a complete waste of time for them | | Static Link |
| Posted by: proxybot at April 2, 2005, 7:43 am | | Topic: which poker site is the easiest to play at? Forum: Bonus Whores | | I wonder what kind of money Full Tilt is paying these pros to play $1/2 and $2/4 at 3 AM when they could be playing their normal $10k/20k games. I haven't seen Jen Harmon on yet, but the rest are pretty regular. | | Static Link |
| Posted by: Verdi at April 2, 2005, 4:29 am | | Topic: which poker site is the easiest to play at? Forum: Bonus Whores | when2run wrote: and by the way, I think the players at Prima are worse than party.
Europeans are generally bad and very agressive - very easy to trap
I played NL on both Prima and Party yesterday. I say that the NL players at Party are 100 times worse. They were tight/weak at Prima and you couldn't build a big pot to save your life. At Party they throwed money at you. | | Static Link |
| Posted by: Aust1227 at April 1, 2005, 5:15 pm | | Topic: which poker site is the easiest to play at? Forum: Bonus Whores | The easiest I have found so far is sportingbet poker.. (check out www.ecasinodeals.com and follow link) It is mostly players from Turkey, and they are absolutely horrible and reckless. But, like pacific, the bad players come at the expense of one screen and horrible software. But, BB per 100 hands here can easily reach 9-10...
For me though. Prima and party are the best combination of all factors. I play prima in the morning and at lunch, and play party in the afternoon and evening. | | Static Link |
| Posted by: when2run at April 1, 2005, 3:42 pm | | Topic: which poker site is the easiest to play at? Forum: Bonus Whores | I assume this last post is a joke -
Eric Seidel a soft pro? John Juanda a soft pro?
Ok, Clonie might be soft, but these other guys are among the best in the world. That doesnt mean us hos can't beat them in a hand or for a session - but if this guy could beat them consitantly we would be reading about him in cardplayer. | | Static Link |
| Posted by: elric at March 28, 2005, 7:28 am | | Topic: which poker site is the easiest to play at? Forum: Bonus Whores | underrated831 wrote: i was wondering which poker site do you guys think is the easiest to play at? which one in your guys opinions has the easiest players to play? thanks a lot
Full Tilt Poker has some soft pros who think they are world champions. Where else can you try and bluff Erik Seidel, John Juanda, Phil Gordon, Erick Lindgren, Andy Bloch, Hoyt Corkins, Phil Ivey, Clonie Gowen, Howard Lederer, Chris Ferguson & Jennifer Harmon out of a huge pot of money. Not to mention the phat bonus that will just line your pockets with more easy money than you will know what to do with.
WARNING: Morrison seems to have had some minor issues clearing his Full Tilt Bonus. Don't get too concerned as most of us here own Chris "Jesus" Ferguson heads up. Jim just needs to work on his game more before clearing this badboy. As you can see the bonus helped him soften the blow to the bankroll.
JimMorrison wrote: Actually, I followed your helpful advice about Full Tilt. Playe... | | Read Entire Entry |
| Posted by: HeelHo at March 28, 2005, 4:37 am | | Topic: which poker site is the easiest to play at? Forum: Bonus Whores | I make more money at other places, but for pure BB win rate, i rocked it the best at paradise. Pacific has great games, but you cant beat the lagmonster, i lose every other UTG hand, then have to post in behind, and thats a big hill to overcome. I think the "all the pros went to party" theory is true. If you are ok with just rakeback and the two bonuses a year, paradise has better rake than party, and some hardcore longterm losers who show up every night and play bad. Very few astute players, party has good players at .5/1, but and the lower NL tourneys, but most of them have deserted paradise. Its still a huge room with 24/7 action at a lot of games and limits, and new traffic, and maybe being tied with sportsbook will hook in some fish.
_________________
If it's a miracle, Colour Sergeant, it's a short chamber Boxer Henry point 45 caliber miracle.
And a bayonet, sir, with some guts behind. | | Static Link |
| Posted by: Loke at March 27, 2005, 8:12 pm | | Topic: which poker site is the easiest to play at? Forum: Bonus Whores | | I'll go against the grain. For LL full ring hold 'em, I prefer crypto sites because of the recurring monthly bonuses. No codes, no 7 day time limits, you have the month to get it completed. In the case of InterPoker, you have months(!!!) to get it done. Party variance has just become a bit to wild for me. | | Static Link |
| Posted by: Patch at March 27, 2005, 7:09 pm | | Topic: which poker site is the easiest to play at? Forum: Bonus Whores | | Pacific has far and away the loosest games I've seen. As was already mentioned, you can only play one table at a time and the software has a number of flaws. I've not played NL there, but I've read that they rake the final amount in the pot, including your final bet even if no one called. If this is true I would definitely stay away from their NL games. | | Static Link |
| Posted by: cmstaab at March 27, 2005, 5:13 pm | | Topic: which poker site is the easiest to play at? Forum: Bonus Whores | | For limit poker, which is all I play, and all most here play I assume, the worst players are at Pacific. Most say Party, but the players at Pacific are so so so much worse it isn't even close. Problem is, you can only play one table at a time at Pacific and the software is horrible, so all things considered, Party is better. | | Static Link |
| Posted by: underrated831 at March 27, 2005, 3:23 pm | | Topic: which poker site is the easiest to play at? Forum: Bonus Whores | i hear that interpoker is easy for this? i just want confirmation from experienced players.
oh yea and i wanna sign up for a rake rebate site for interpoker but it says i cannot sign up if i lareayd have an interpoker account. i was wondering is there any way to cancel the interpoker account and make another account? th anks | | Static Link |
|