| Posted by: gumica at February 23, 2006, 11:14 pm | | Topic: Poker Stars lost it's touch? Forum: Bonus Whores | Well i think Everestpoker got the lowest rake (3% last time i looked, instead of 5%) and look how many players they have got
And party with fixed the same. 10% rake is alot but they still get players. So i dont think people care too much about low rake even thou they probably should.[/quote]
thx for reply. don't know about everest structure, but maybe this is explanation. will not go into their marketing or if site is buggy, player friendly or just not so nice looking tables.
lest compare 3% instead:
if they take 3% sharp and don't have usual structure, that means they take more than stars at lower limits.
EVEREST: 10000 x 0.50$ = 5.000$ ( 15$ ) STARS: 10000 x 0.00$ = 0$
EVEREST: 10000 x 0.75$ = 7.500$ ( 25$ ) STARS: 10000 x 1.00$ = 10.000$
EVEREST: 10000 x 1.05$ = 10.500$ ( 35$ ) STARS: 10000 x 1.00$ = 10.000$
EVEREST: 23.000$ vs STARS: 20.000$
surely this is just for this comparison, change limits and you might get another result. what i am trying to say is that slightly better is just not enough - there should be obvious difference. only that would bring critical number of players and those will bring the others too. (and hopefully the other sites might realise that they should lower their rake too - i still think that would be the best bonus they could offer to us)
thanks for your opinion. |
|
Casino Classic
Get $500 free on the house!
Categories:
poker room playing cards gambling tips free poker poker rooms baccarat play poker video poker poker bonus codes poker tips blackjack casino games free gambling betting gambling system online blackjack poker game texas holdem poker internet poker poker hands
Links:
Movie Talks
Forum Extractor
|