Casino Talks

Posted by: garyzimmer at March 11, 2002, 2:38 pm

Topic: Tweaking Software Forum: Winner Online

quote from skyewin post:

"I know the sample is far too small to be significant but I got a really bad feeling about the game. Doubling was also horribly unlucky for me. I'd get a nine or ten on a ten once in six or seven attempts. The number of times I'd end up with a total of 12-16 was ... disheartening."

I'm seeing more and more of this kind of comment. Each time, the player questioning the 'tweaking' of software, qualifies their suspicion by saying their experience is too limited to be 'significant' indicating a 'fairness' in their evaluation.

I believe there is sufficient reason to question some occurances that defy belief based on frequency alone.

All of this can be explained away with math, but those of us who rely less on equations and more on conditioning ('being reluctant to push a button because a robotic fist emerges from the wall and smacks us' time after time) become reluctant to, as an example, doubledown with the dealer showing a six knowing that a 20 or 21 is more than likely to result from that six!

Acknowledging the odor won't clean up it's source but it's a step...

[This message has been edited by garyzimmer (edited 03-11-2002).]

[This message has been edited by garyzimmer (edited 03-11-2002).]

Casino Classic
Get $500 free on the house!

Categories:

poker tournament poker games free slots poker chip sets poker game online casino baccarat online poker casinos slots poker tournaments free online poker online blackjack gambling tips gambling odds roulette poker room poker chips poker secrets casino games

Links:

Movie Talks
Forum Extractor

Casino Classic.
Get $500 free on the house!