| Posted by: Trader v1.1 at July 27, 2003, 9:01 pm | | Topic: casino on net Forum: Winner Online |
I really don't feel like I need to submit a "case." I played by the rules, won just over $8700 at CON from December 1999 to April 20, 2003 and was always paid promptly. Almost $3600 of that $8700 was from promotions and comp points, so I certainly have no complaints about the promotions I was given, the fairness of the games, or speed of payment.
Even if my account were to be reopened, I would have a feeling that I needed to be looking over my shoulder to see if I might be iolating some other unwritten rule. One of the written rules is that the casino can close an account if they want. I accept that. At least I know now that I will not lose back any portion of my winnings and CON will remain #3 on my lifetime winnings list for a while. There are still lots of places that welcome my action, and many of them have a blackjack game with a lower house advantage than CON. This is not something I want to argue about.
The CON web site now has the correct rules for blackjack posted. If any of you want to play there, go ahead. You could do a lot worse.
|
| |
Similar entries:
Virtualcasino group The man from the hood top ten casinos for this month Casino Ratings The man from the hood top 10 Casinos for March The man from the hood Best 20 Casinos for the year 2003 Online casino groups The Casino Online Hello - Blackjack Gambler Online casino groups Positive experience at Casino Triple Sevens
|
|
Casino Classic Get $500 free on the house!
Categories:
gambling best casino play poker internet gambling casino chips poker rooms playing cards texas holdem tournament texas holdem poker free poker poker stars poker table online slots casino games blackjack poker chip sets casino game casino gambling poker hands betting
Links:
Movie Talks
Forum Extractor
|