| Posted by: caruso at July 26, 2003, 12:53 pm | | Topic: casino on net Forum: Winner Online |
Trader, if you didn't find that Email rude then you received one different to the one I got - and I'm sure we got the same one.
The rule discrepancy you mention is another issue, and equally unwholesome. CON used to have a fine Blackjack game; now that it's sunk into the same mediocrity as all the others, and given that the rest of the CON game selection is nondescript (to put it mildly), what is there that now distinguishes CON from other reputable casinos, that would cause Player X to choose CON over casino A, B or C? Crypto has some good VP and and pretty much identical blackjack, MG has a fine VP / slot selection and excellent blackjack (assuming a fair game), Boss is much of a muchness, and RTG is lightening fast with one or two excellent table games and occasionally good VP.
Having ditched the "trademark" blackjack game, I see nothing now that marks out CON against the competition - other than its longevity, and an advertising budget that would make the Sultan Of Brunei look cheap.
|
| |
Similar entries:
Virtualcasino group The man from the hood top ten casinos for this month Casino Ratings The man from the hood top 10 Casinos for March The man from the hood Best 20 Casinos for the year 2003 Online casino groups The Casino Online Hello - Blackjack Gambler Online casino groups Positive experience at Casino Triple Sevens
|
|
Casino Classic Get $500 free on the house!
Categories:
online texas holdem texas holdem tournament video poker blackjack play casino internet gambling poker room gambling casinos poker tournament casino bonus free online poker poker rules poker hands casino poker poker cards poker strategy poker bonus codes online poker gambling tips
Links:
Movie Talks
Forum Extractor
|