Casino Talks

Posted by: Vahe Baloulian at July 26, 2003, 9:17 am

Topic: casino on net Forum: Winner Online

1. There were 36 apparently that were initially denied the bonus for completely no reason. I would like to know how they decided which 7 to remove the bonus from in the end. I now think Erik Shirak (reef club) = Vahe Baloulian (CON). Anyone seen them at the same place at the same time? –

Conspiracy theories are fun. Anyone seen me at all? I don't date Erik Shirak, who is not with Reef for a long time anyway, to be "at the same place at the same time." ;-) Erik may have mentioned mentioned 36 players, but all I see from where I am now – only 7 were not allowed to cash out the bonus and 1 was blocked. All of them got their winnings.
I am not quite sure how these 7 were picked. From my experience, I can say that casinos sometimes overreact and initial number may have resulted from that. It is also possible that the rest of the members simply continued playing and showed that they are not there for the bonus only. As I said, Erik is not here and I can only guess how 36 became 7. I am just happy that it was not other way around - 7 becoming 36.
We can go on about this forever. The fact is that Reef and its current members benefited from that decision, however bad it was.
Belief is harder to shake than knowledge and I am not trying to change your mind about Reef. You asked the question, I gave you the facts. For one reason or another, you can't check these facts and for me that explains your skepticism. I don't know if you have a membership with us, but those who do must feel that Reef is doing fine and Casino-on-Net is doing even better.

2. 10 however. If you have a system where you can decipher who to or not to advance comps or bonuses to why do people need to be banished?(fraudsters not included) Take Caruso as a perfect example. –

I don't know what happened to Caruso and asked him to give me a chance to investigate.
Fraudsters aside, if the hardcore bonus players take too much of casino resources, specially support-wise, it is more cost effective to discontinue their membership. However, keep in mind that closing an account is a drastic measure not taken on a whim. If Caruso decides to reveal his identity to me, I will check his story.

Thanks,
Vahe

P.S. Just saw Bart's letter. Will respond shortly.

[This message has been edited by Vahe Baloulian (edited 07-26-2003).]

Casino Classic
Get $500 free on the house!

Categories:

online texas holdem online poker gambling online slots slots play poker baccarat internet casino casino poker free casino internet gambling poker stars poker hands video poker gambling casinos casino chips poker tournaments free poker casino slots roulette

Links:

Movie Talks
Forum Extractor

Casino Classic.
Get $500 free on the house!