Casino Talks

Posted by: derelict at October 17, 2006, 5:55 am

Topic: WagerWorks blackjack: conclusive evidence of cheating if the data is genuine Forum: Winner Online

Quote: Originally Posted by caruso
The stats are for those hands where the dealer didn't bust, ie. drew to a non-bust total (17 - 21), not for those hands the dealer didn't complete through a player bust.

I went back and reread the thread and couldn't find much detail on the sampling method, and as you stated, the logs are not available. Clearly the proper procedure would be to throw out the non-counting hands, and nafanny may well have done so.

I was just pointing out a possible error that could cause the bust stats to be lower than normal. If you've erified this to be incorrect then this probably isn't a factor.

Software fairness is a big issue for me, especially with the US playing field being increasingly narrowed to smaller operations. I'm near certain that OddsOn/English Harbour was intentionally cheating, but am not yet certain that this is an accurate recording of the hands played in this case.

Edit: I still believe the results posted would be improbable, even if this error were introduced. I doubt that this would account for the entirety of the low percentages unless the player was playing extremely poor strategy, hitting on nineteen and such.

Casino Classic
Get $500 free on the house!

Categories:

play casino poker game poker tournaments gambling casinos poker chips poker secrets internet gambling blackjack poker chip sets online blackjack internet casino casino games poker rules casino video poker casino gambling poker table online texas holdem online casinos poker room

Links:

Movie Talks
Forum Extractor

Casino Classic.
Get $500 free on the house!