Casino Talks

Posted by: derelict at October 17, 2006, 3:51 am
Topic: WagerWorks blackjack: conclusive evidence of cheating if the data is genuine Forum: Winner Online


Quote: Originally Posted by bonuslover
Incorrect, in stats what you don't know doesn't count. Unless there is a tiny correlation between a player's bust and the dealer's bust (which I think there should be a tiny winy % as when P draws to bust it usually involve a face card and that decreases the chance of D's busting.) But if that's the case it would actually work against your argument.


I don't think you understand what I said. If the player busts and there are no other hands on the table, the dealer does not need to hit. There is no reason to becuase in standard rules, the dealer wins when the player busts, regardless of the dealer outcome. The dealer will never bust without hitting.

Again, it is too early to say that this caused the result, or that the results are invalid, but counting hands where the dealer did not hit would be one method of bad sampling.

Similar entries:

WagerWorks blackjack: conclusive evidence of cheating if the data is genuine
WagerWorks blackjack: conclusive evidence of cheating if the data is genuine
online bingo the big lie
Vip Casino Wagerlogic - questionable BJ results
English Harbour dealing a cheating video poker game
Major Absolute Poker Issue
Bodog Cheats
Romper Room is not/is too threads
Microgaming Casinos
A newbie impression

Casino Classic
Get $500 free on the house!

Categories:

free gambling  gambling casinos  playing cards  poker tournament  roulette  gambling tips  poker rules  poker tips  play casino  casino  online slots  poker table  poker tournaments  poker rooms  free online poker  poker  craps  poker bonus codes  texas holdem  casino bonus  

Links:

Movie Talks
Forum Extractor







Casino Classic.
Get $500 free on the house!



CLOSE