| Posted by: twizzybop at February 1, 2006, 3:51 am | | Topic: BlackJack Forum: Card Chat |
1st stop assuming because that makes an ass out of you and me..
Third bet (assuming first and second are lost): You are risking $9 for a less than 50% chance of a net gain of $5
Nope you have it wrong.. you are risking $3.00 on the $4.00 that you lost on the 1st and 2nd bet.... Like I said every other bet is 3X.... meaning at most you could lose is $7.00
Now since we are making asses out of ourselves.. you win 1st hand.. net of $3.00.. you lose next 2.. Net lose of only $1.00(there is your house edge).
Now assume again you win the 1st 2 hands and lose the 3rd.. Net gain of $1.00..So now lets assume after those 3 hands and that net gain of $1.00
You lose the next 2..Net lose of $3.00..So in 5 hands of Black Jack you have lost $3.00, making that on avg of .60 a hand.
Now you won't win big but you will be ahead.. You really think staying at a table that you are losing at will win you back your money? That's crazy..
Thats like taking a big hit in hold-em and trying to get your money back.
Yet lets assume again here.. so many possibilities..
You win your 1st 3 hands.. Net gain of $7.00.. Now lets say you lose 2 straight, win 1, lose 1 and win 4 straight.. then lose 3..
What we have..Net gain of $3.00.. avg won per hand .49 a hand...
That is why the play of 3 comes in.. play 3X the amount bet every other hand, you lose 3 hands.. give it up.
There is no simple "system" with which blackjack can be beaten in the long run
If you honestly don't think the simplicity of 3 don't work, by all means give it a try. If it doesn't work then not everyone is made to work well with simplicity.
Now I know what you will ask me.. assuming that you do use the simple 3.
You win $1.00, lose $3.00, win $1.00, lose $3.00.. clearly shows every 2 hands a net lose of $2.00.
So simplicity again happens.. I said lose 3 hands and then don't play at that table anymore. So net lose at most would be $7.00.. So If you are going to stop at $7.00, why wouldn't you stop at the $6.00 or $8.00 lose at the net lose of $2.00 per 2 hands.
The edge is only 2% diffrence.. you honestly think that you will run into the 2% black because of simplicity. No cards to count.
Reason why I say leave a table after 3 loses.. most of the time the cards are cold(you shouldn't be at a table that is giving you cold cards).
It is the most simpliest Math card game out there..Closest person to 21 wins.
You could even start the other way, bet $1.00, bet $3.00, bet $1.00, bet $3.00..
One $3.00 win covers the next 2 bets even if they both are losers. Yes, net lose would be $1.00, but next hand is $1.00..
You are betting 48% to win.. so yes the odds swing in the house's favor by 2%, but you are risking at most $2.33 a hand out of $7.00 using the $3.00 bet 1st and $1.66 a hand out of $5.00 using the $1.00 bet 1st.
So avg bet is 33.3% of your 3 bets s a 48% to win... looks to me like the edge is taken away.
|
| |
Similar entries:
Riverbelle is fraudulant!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! wofacai bonus issue: Pontoon = Blackjack Game? Blackjack Ballroom - Huh? wofacai bonus issue: Pontoon = Blackjack Game? CelebPoker Launches CelebBlackjack wofacai bonus issue: Pontoon = Blackjack Game? I'm a noob, need tips because lost 4k at 32 vegas Jackpot Palace Casino Jackpot Palace Casino How often do you play?
|
|
Casino Classic Get $500 free on the house!
Categories:
blackjack casino game casino gambling baccarat poker tips full tilt poker internet casino free online poker poker game poker hands free poker internet gambling texas holdem poker poker tables online texas holdem poker games poker tournament poker table poker room poker bonus codes
Links:
Movie Talks
Forum Extractor
|