| Posted by: RammerJammer at July 7, 2005, 12:35 pm | | Topic: Bluffing Theory part deux Forum: Card Chat |
I would suggest that betting the King in this experiment is only a "semi-bluff". I occasionally get accused at the table of "bluffing" when I'm holding a decent drawing hand, like a double-gutshot, open-ended, or four-flush. That's not technically an outright bluff, as I'm betting to build the pot toward the prospect of eventually making my hand and getting a decent pay-off. Representing the Q in your bet as the A or K would be a true bluff, because you know you're holding the worst possible hand with no chance of improvement.
So, given the h2h 3-card scenario here, I think position rules. Whether I'm the first to act or not is going to dictate how I play the A,K, or Q as much as (or more than) the actual card I'm holding.
|
| |
Similar entries:
When to bluff
Bluffing Theory part deux
bluffing
Ill Post Results Here
Bluffing theory
Book Discussion: Theory of Poker, chapter 18-20
does ANYONE else play on party?
NLH Small Stakes Cash Game: where are the profits?
bluffing
Limit theory question: optimal bluffing frequency ?
|
|
Casino Classic
Get $500 free on the house!
Categories:
free gambling gambling tips video poker free online poker baccarat poker game online poker play casino casino game poker rooms poker sites casino games betting online slots casino poker poker bonus codes blackjack poker stars internet gambling internet casino
Links:
Movie Talks
Forum Extractor
|