| Posted by: AlwaysStuck at March 30, 2006, 8:36 pm | | Topic: Book Discussion: Theory of Poker, chapters 8-10 Forum: Card Chat |
I think that, given Sklansky's theories, a bad player would be defined as one who doesn't give any thought to what cards his opponent might have or is consistently wrong in his assessment thereof. The former kind of bad player cannot be deceived because he hasn't formed an idea of your hand in the first place. The latter kind of bad player is dangerous to deceive because, if he has the wrong idea about your hand, trying to deceive him might give him the *right* idea.
There are other ways to define bad players, of course, but I'm just addressing the Fundamental Theorem of Poker here.
The Bleeder
|
| |
Similar entries:
Book Discussion: Theory of Poker, chapters 1-3.
Free book , SS2 or ToP?
Strategy book
If you could only own one poker book . . .
Useful Threads of the Past
Book Discussion - is there interest?
next book
Sklansky's No Limit Book
If you could only own one poker book . . .
If you could only own one poker book . . .
|
|
Casino Classic
Get $500 free on the house!
Categories:
poker room betting casino games free slots play casino baccarat casino gambling online blackjack casino bonus gambling poker sites online texas holdem poker tournament poker table poker stars casino slots poker poker secrets poker chips poker rooms
Links:
Movie Talks
Forum Extractor
|