| Posted by: FlushOnFlop at July 4, 2007, 5:23 pm | | Topic: To be a master, what counts? Forum: Card Chat |
Hi all. I am seeking some general feedback from players whether they are new, avg joe, pro, etc....
Under what criteria do you feel a poker player deserves "master" player status?
What do you look for in a player to call him or her a "master" of the game?
Could it be one or more of the following:
1) winning an wsop or other major event title?
2) winning multi titles over career?
3) cashes in more than 90% of time?
4) tactics, logic, math, etc...
5) overall career winnings?
Any others?
Should there be a global standard to be considered a "master"? And if so what is the criteria?
1) New player
2) Average player
3) Professional
4) Master player?
Example: just because a player wins 1st at the paradise masters does not count. Why would it? Or should it?
Thank you much for your input.
|
| |
Similar entries:
will more licensees leave microgaming ? You've come for poker wisdom, eager poker player? More on Microgaming's Possible Cheating Favorite players =) SportingBet Bonus Clearing Update (Boss Media= Must Do!) Towergaming endless bonus? SportingBet Bonus Clearing Update (Boss Media= Must Do!) Bettors Review - Casino Ratings and Reviews Chris Ferguson's Bankroll Management Future Credit Card Problems?
|
|
Casino Classic Get $500 free on the house!
Categories:
play poker poker rules poker tips poker strategy internet gambling best casino full tilt poker video poker internet casino texas holdem tournament poker tournaments poker free slots texas holdem gambling casinos poker chip sets free gambling poker tables gambling online blackjack
Links:
Movie Talks
Forum Extractor
|