Appreciate the +rep, folks!!
Anyway, to your point Combuboom, sure that it's not your hands would be a more reliable source of observation. But though you admit that sample size is an issue, I don't think you (or anyone, really) understands just how much sample size matters.
Every time something weird happens in an online poker match (quads 3 hands in a row, being dealt the same cards 3 times in succession, river suckout 3 times in a row, etc), it doesn't prove anything. All it shows is that either an extreme outcome occurred or the site is somehow rigged. But to eliminate the first possibility in favour of the second requires a massive amount of data, not just to "prove" it to the rest of us but frankly to justify the accusations being lobbed around in the first place.
|