Casino Talks

Posted by: Vesuvio at December 22, 2006, 9:45 am
Topic: The Palace group Jackpotinaflash: resolved Forum: Casino Meister


Quote: Originally Posted by spearmaster

The website in my signature, by the way, posts information. And the page you are referring to states a known truth, furthermore the site makes no attempt to convince people that playing progressive slots is profitable or anything of the sort.

It's not so much the manner of the "known truth" (progressive jackpots make the casinos the most money), but the way it's phrased: "a dream come true for the player, and for you, the online casino operator". But ok, let's not argue stylistics!

Quote: Originally Posted by spearmaster

And furthermore I did not bring Caruso's own site into any discussion - it is amazing how one can promote casinos with one hand and punch with the other. Let me assure you that if he was the savior of the players, the mere fact that he has affiliate links shows otherwise.

I understand you dislike Caruso, but to argue that any site with a few affiliate links (even if the links are to decent casinos and the website is explaining how not to lose to casinos - meaning the revenues aren't exactly likely to be high) is equivalent to any other is nonsense. I don't think Caruso's the "saviour", but on forums he's a useful oice keeping casinos in check and his website takes nothing away from that. Again, if you want to argue it compromises Caruso then that obviously goes for you a 1000-fold.

Quote: Originally Posted by spearmaster

I have never made any secret of the fact that my former site (and also the site you are referring to, which by the way is no longer under my management)

How about removing it from your signature, then? I really think a Casinomeister moderator promoting a site encouraging the least profitable way to play casinos is inadvisable.

Quote: Originally Posted by spearmaster

Your attempt to paint me, and/or Casinomeister, as "sweetness and light" is ery disappointing.

Ok, I might have gone a bit far there!

Quote: Originally Posted by spearmaster

But I happen to be a convenient target for many, for whatever reasons, and I accept this as part and parcel of the job. I do draw the line, however, at insinuations that people like Caruso make which have absolutely no basis in fact, no proof whatsoever, and are clearly not representative of any efforts I make, whether on behalf of players, affiliates or casinos. And of course I object to the slinging about of my name in the derogatory manner in which Caruso chooses to do so.

I haven't been reading any forums recently which might have such insinuations, but if there have been attacks then I can understand what looked like an unprovoked attack on someone who couldn't respond. In which case I might not have fired off a response

Anyway, I'll try not to derail this thread anymore. In short, Stanford's analysis above simply strikes me as correct.

Similar entries:

MummysGold Casino (PalaceGroup). Something stinks here...
Spin palace complaint: resolved
Spin Palace question
More Palace Group SPAM!
Piggs Casino Promo - Can they be right?
Poker Sites Status Thread
SpinPalace
How Come?.......
As usual palace group rocks
Marking issues "RESOLVED" - it's official.

Casino Classic
Get $500 free on the house!

Categories:

baccarat  poker strategy  texas holdem  poker rules  casino chips  best casino  online poker  craps  online texas holdem  poker rooms  poker bonus codes  gambling odds  gambling tips  poker tables  online blackjack  poker chip sets  online slots  poker table  online casino  casino bonus  

Links:

Movie Talks
Forum Extractor







Casino Classic.
Get $500 free on the house!



CLOSE