Quote: Originally Posted by Da_Gambla
Your summary is quite erroneous. I do not, nor have ever stated that it is RIGHT for them to ever evoke such clauses, but can you not GRIP reality? The fact is, THEY CAN AND DO SO, regardless of what I or anyone else thinks.
Sorry, but that is not true. My summary was quite correct.
You quoted the clause and said the player "should stop bitching" because he was in "clear iolation of that clause".
This has no other meaning other than the casino can justify denying winnings because of this clause. You made zero comment as its its obvious and complete absurdity as a clause. That is just bizarre.
It is, in effect, an "endownment" clause ... bestowing on the player that he is "legally" somehow subjected to whatever the casino dictates irrespective of merit.
Fraud is thrown at a player for the most minor transgression and, yet, in the likes of English harbour when they did 1000worse (ie cheating software) ... it is still resolves to (to quote spearmaster, a mod at the time) a "silly error which anyone could make".
Sorry, your points smacks of being an apologist.
|