De Gambla ... to summarise your iew :
Gamblers at a casino must not complain to a forum if they feel harshly treated otherwise the clause you qoute gives them every right to deny any payment.
The casino will unilaterally decide if it iews any posts to be unfair.
In effect, the player must remain speechless to his own opinions to their treatment by a casino otherwise they may fall foul of the clause you support.
Sorry, but again, you are not making any sense.
Ironically, especially, in a casino complaints section of a forum.
Sorry, just nonsense mate. Such opinions are too frequent on here ... i.e. the player should accept what he is given and always doff his cap to the casino, bryan, whoever and hope he gets a lucky break.
Just rubbish really.
The player is a customer and, while most certainly may not always be right and may often be wrong, he does have every right to express his own personal opinion.
Oh, yes, sorry, this "bonus fraud" phrase ahs been raised so he must be scum despite noone except Bryan and the casino knowing the facts.
Not dissing Bryan here per se ... just I feel i am adult enough to make my own mind up without doffing my cap to someone who believes (despite what many experienced players and indeed casinos believe) that thinking pontoon is not synominous with BJ is wholly suffiecient grounds to deny someone their winnings.
This is ignoring such previous episodes as English harbour and Shark casino which, to this day, has left a nasty smell around the place for an awful lot of people.
Sorry for being blunt folks but, hey, I am expressing an honest opinion ... should I be fined a months winnings, banned, whatever?
Just absurd.
|