Quote: Originally Posted by inylweatherman
In the Fortune Lounge case, Casinomeister sided with players because FL had NO term forbidding such play, and said FL should add such a term if this play was not allowed. CR have added such a term, so this is why winnings were confiscated.
For the record, in that case did Fortune Lounge have any language in the T&C permitting confiscation of winnings because of "bonus abuse" or some similar subjective criteria? If it did and Casinomeister still ruled against them, this could be important to the complaint just posted by swiftjames.
|