Casino Talks

Posted by: lojo at January 18, 2008, 4:25 am

Topic: Cirrus:Worst Casino of 2007 Forum: Casino Meister

Quote: Originally Posted by debbiek

why bother? I just explained that fully in my post. I would never tell a friend of mine to go and deposit at the Mainstreet group of casinos for example because they could go open their window and just throw their money out.

The point is if you are looking for alue and entertainment with your money, then a bonus that offers no minimum play and no max cashout is a real advantage. The slots are not as tight there and you have a ery good starting bankroll to play. That's why I bother in addition to the fact they have always paid me.

See my other post.

When that group actually divests certain casinos - completely- and those casinos change their names, I might buy what you are saying (as I have said in the past) but as long as the Virtual 'stable' answers to an accounting department that can not, after all of this time, pay an owed wager, and as long as individual managers get to play games with owed wagers, and as long as Virtual is Virtual - Cirrus can have the honors this year. It would have been just as easy for BB to give the dubious honor to ANY of the casinos in the group.

Again, I WANT them to do well, they never will as they are.

Casino Classic
Get $500 free on the house!

Categories:

poker game online casino full tilt poker video poker poker casino gambling casino game play poker internet gambling casino games online casinos casino bonus poker sites poker chip sets poker tables gambling system free gambling poker rooms betting gambling tips

Links:

Movie Talks
Forum Extractor

Casino Classic.
Get $500 free on the house!